(a) The deductible level for the property claims at Headquarters was 100,000, meaning that most property losses could never be claimed.

Therefore, the losses incurred by the Claimant were not reasonably avoidable.

Paragraph 1 of this Article does not affect the responsibilities, liabilities, rights or immunities of the shipper.

Audit of E 1 claims, 10th instalment

Audit of F 4 claims, 5th instalment

The Board considers that the lack of authoritative guidelines on the major aspects of the compensation scheme allowed scope for differing interpretations of the Commission s requirements and for simple avoidable errors to be made in the completion of claim forms. Expedited processing procedures

When calculating salary losses, claimants had submitted claims for differing time periods, ranging from months to several years.

Freedom of contract approach vs. exemption from liability approach

The minimum wage shall be exempt from attachment, compensation, or deduction.

Audit of D 1 claims, 19th instalment

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012105, the claimant did not include audited accounts in his original claim submission.

The UNCC secretariat noted further that, in any event, the privileges and immunities of the United Nations would protect UNCC, the Compensation Fund and the United Nations as a whole against litigation in connection with this matter.

Specifically, the secretariat, in valuing the claimant's D6 (loss of income) claim, applied an incorrect multiplier to the claimant's monthly income.

The total compensation sought in the claims reviewed in this report is USD 49,936,562,997.

The evidence provided by the claimant in support of this claim indicated that a multiplier of 10 should have been used to calculate the compensation for this claim.

The Panel finds that it is not possible to calculate the exchange rate separately for each individual claim.

As stated in paragraph 21, a total of 29,065 claims were filed by such claimants.

As stated in paragraph 22, a total of 398 claims were filed by such claimants.

As stated in paragraph 25, a total of 1,446 claims were filed by such claimants.

The Panel found that there were no matches between the client lists and the claimants in this instalment who provided pre invasion accounts purportedly prepared by these auditors.

In decision 9, paragraph 6, the Governing Council recognized that claimants are under a duty to mitigate damages and has instructed the panels not to compensate losses that could reasonably have been avoided .

The Panel recommends a total of USD 568,296.05 in compensation in respect of the eligible category C claims in this instalment.

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3011745 the claimant seeks compensation of USD 1,176,470.59 in relation to two businesses and submitted a licence for each business.

Specifically, the secretariat, in valuing the claimant's D6 (loss of income) claim, incorrectly treated it as a duplicate of the claimant's C6 (salary loss) claim, resulting in an erroneous reduction of the amount of compensation awarded to the claimant for his C6 claim.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

The Panel reviewed the statistical data indicating that these claimants claimed more frequently for business losses and for substantially higher amounts than claimants in the regular category D claims programme.

Number of Claims Not Recommended for Payment

The aggregate amounts of the corrected amounts per country, by claim instalment, are as follows

GE.97 64686 The aggregate corrected amount per country, by claim instalment, are as follows

The Panel recommends no award of compensation for three claims.

The Office found that claimants had abused the system by filing false claims with the assistance of accounting companies in Kuwait.

To assess claims for losses of personal property and cash, the Panel developed a statistical model to estimate an amount each claimant might reasonably have been expected to claim.

Kuwait was provided with the claim form referred to above which was devised for bedoun claims.

As a result of this computational error, the Panel had recommended compensation in the amount of USD 529,171.60 for the claimant's D8 D9 losses.

The statistical data shows that while the average and median claimed amounts for business losses are substantially higher than for claims in the regular category D claims programme, the average and median recommended awards are generally lower than awards in the regular category D claims programme.

CRPC has been able significantly to increase its ability to process claims as a result of a new computerized property records database.

Tangible property Sixteen of the stand alone claims seek compensation for tangible property losses for a total asserted value of KWD 4,545,213 (approximately USD 15,727,381).

No compensation has been recommended for C7 Real Property losses where claimants fail to establish the fact of ownership.

Accordingly the Panel recommends that no compensation be awarded for this claim.

In a number of instances, claimants appeared not to recognize the types of losses or amounts claimed in their claims or some of the documents provided in support of their claims.

The Panel reviewed the statistical data and noted that the average and median claimed amounts are generally lower than amounts claimed in the regular category D claims programme and the average proposed awards for these losses are also lower than the awards in the regular claims programme.

The Panel reviewed the statistical data and noted that the average and median claimed amounts are generally lower than amounts claimed in the regular category D claims programme and the average proposed awards for these losses are similar to the awards in the regular category D claims programme.

At the court, the victim's family asked Han to compensate for a total of 530,000 yuan in the form of funeral expenses and compensation for death.

In respect of the claim for loss of future earnings, the Panel recommends an award of compensation calculated in accordance with the D2 (personal injury) methodology.

Specifically, the secretariat, in valuing the loss of income component of the claimant's D8 D9 (individual business) loss claim, used an incorrect average monthly income amount.