2.4 The complainant argues that he has exhausted domestic remedies.

He contends that article 5, paragraph 2, of the Covenant precludes the State party from contending that First Nations do not, in international law, have such status, for it has been conferred on them by domestic law.

His trial allegedly lasted a few minutes and he had no access to a defence lawyer.

The authors contend that the appeal court wrongly believed they did not want to adduce any evidence.

It has been alleged that the trial might be linked to his work as a human rights defender.

They claim to have been the victims of judicial errors and violations of the right to a defence and the principle of adversarial proceedings.

You plead innocent and can't produce the money?

2.4 The author contends that charges against him were fabricated, and that accusations against him were very general.

The author contends therefore that the violation of which he claims to be a victim is indeed attributable to the State party.

4.6 The State party asserts that the communication does not meet the minimum requirements for compatibility with article 22 of the Convention.

The State party argues that in his absence, the court was able to examine the case on the basis of the written arguments provided.

10.2 He disputes the State party apos s contention that he did not avail himself of domestic remedies.

And he defended his unusual approach in talking about relations with Kim.

The author argued that, in accordance with Aboriginal practice, his extended family would take care of his children during his absence.

He has moreover argued that fishing with a licence constitutes a privilege, whereas he claims to fish as of right.

10.6 As to the State party's argument that he can fish with a recreational licence, the author asserts that he is not a recreational fisher.

7.2 Contrary to his initial submission, the author now contends that no charges have been filed against the suspects of the alleged assault to date.

In his cassation appeal against this judgement, the author contended that his defence relating to the tapped telephone calls had till not been responded to.

He argued that the inconsistencies in his evidence were not such as to make his testimony unreliable.

3.1 The complainant contended that his return would violate article 3, and that he should be returned only if it could be demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that the claim was false.

4.4 The State party rejects the author's argument that the application of section 101a reduced his possibilities to defend himself before the Committee, arguing that the guarantees of article 14 of the Covenant only apply to appeals at the national level.

In any event, counsel argues that the complainant's present condition does not establish how he was treated in the past.

He argues that, ultimately, any discrimination can be undone by downgrading the position of the group that is treated more favourably.

In the United States, according to Amnesty International at least 16 of those executed between 1985 and 2001 had been defended by lawyers who were incompetent or who failed to mount an adequate case for the defence.

AMs will get the final vote on the question of what they should be called when they debate the legislation.

He appeared in court Saturday, where he declared himself not guilty, for sure when asked his plea, reported the network.

She contends that the criteria established in article 3 of the Convention have been fulfilled.

He contends that hunting, fishing, gathering and trapping are essential components of his culture, and that denial of the ability to exercise it imperils transmission of the culture to other persons and to later generations.

Counsel argued that the State party had not supplied this information to the Committee.

It is thus alleged that the right to legal counsel was violated.

He contends that it has been satisfactorily established that the complainant was in fact subjected to torture after his return.

4.2 The State party contends that the author had the right to apply to the court for rehabilitation , but that no such application was made.

They contend the Superior Court misinterpreted this statement to mean a renunciation to provide any evidence at all, even before him.

4.3 Thirdly, the State party argues that domestic remedies were not exhausted.

The authors contend that the Decree is null and void from a constitutional point of view.

The source alleged that Ikpe was charged with being an accessory after the fact, in connection with treason, for having passed to others the text of the defence submission of colonel Bello Fadile.

Furthermore, defence lawyers allegedly do not have access to court documents, nor do they have adequate time to prepare a defence for their clients.

4.8 The State party refers to the decision by the Refugee Protection Division, which, after having heard the complainant, concluded that his testimony contained significant gaps.

He contends that the proper test is whether there is a restrictive effect on political opinion through its omission in the Ontario Code.

2.9 By submission of 17 March 2004, the authors contend that Argentina continues to act in bad faith towards them.

Firstly, the State party argues that a corporation does not enjoy the rights protected by the Covenant.

3.2 The author submits that the courts' failure to give any reasons for dismissing his defence made his right to appeal his conviction meaningless.

Mr. Hijazi (Palestine), speaking in exercise of the right of reply, said he wished to answer some of the inaccurate and misleading allegations made by the representative of Israel.

By reference to the Committee's jurisprudence, he argues that his immediate expulsion from Denmark would render examination of his communication by the Committee moot.

They contend that counsels apos failure to consult with them and to respect their instructions resulted in a violation of article 14, paragraphs 3 (b) and (d).