The fact has been established.

The Fourth Geneva Convention is absolutely clear with regard to the prohibition of such actions.

I'm not responsible for the decision. Don't you see?

To the contrary, the note stated unequivocally there is no objection .

You don't know the difference between right and wrong.

6. Clarity should be a goal in the formulation of Security Council resolutions imposing sanctions.

Let me get that straight. I must have misunderstood you.

Whatever I ask them to do can be done. They know that if you don't.

No talk of past errors. Always look forward.

Nonetheless, the reality had been very different, and in that regard, the speaker would have liked to hear Arab speakers clearly and unequivocally condemn terrorism and bomb attacks perpetrated against civilians.

I think they heard that in no uncertain terms today.

I can't understand any of this.

Israel consistently flouts the norms and principles of international law which clearly and unequivocally prohibit direct and indiscriminate attacks against civilians.

But he beguiled a great many of you. Why did you not then understand?

And he has indeed led a large number of you astray so did you not have sense?

He led astray many a throng of you did you not understand?

And yet assuredly he hath led astray of you a great multitude. Wherefore reflect ye not?

And indeed he (Satan) did lead astray a great multitude of you. Did you not, then, understand?

He has misled a great multitude of you. Did you not understand?

Still, he misguided a whole throng of you. Did you have no sense?

Yet he hath led astray of you a great multitude. Had ye then no sense?

Certainly, he has led astray many of your generations. Have you not exercised your reason?

Yet he has led many a host of you astray, did you not understand?

And he had already led astray from among you much of creation, so did you not use reason?

Satan misled a great multitude of you. Did you not have any understanding?

And certainly he led astray numerous people from among you. What! could you not then understand?

Yet he led astray a great multitude of you. Why did you not then understand?

But he did lead astray a great multitude of you. Did ye not, then, understand?

The guy has no idea what to do.

You know you did.

Understand you've been doing a fine job out there.

My second example is the fight against terrorism, which demands unambiguous responses.

Well, I want to be prepared, see?

Is that your idea of love? I've got no idea of love.

And it's obvious to anyone, that if we can do this, we absolutely will do this, whatever the consequences are.

Certain situations are of course perfectly clear.

Chapter IV Certification of the financial statements

And I'm gonna keep on doin' it, see?

Why?

You came to find out if I'd made the charge.

I don't stand for phoney alibis, see?

It's plain enough. Old cripples ain't wanted.

The evidence is clear big countries can lose small wars. So, if massive use of force fails, how is a big country, believing that its interests or moral duty compel it to intervene in the affairs of a small one, to do so successfully?

But Soviet nostalgia has far more to do with Russia s traditional Great Power ambitions than with communism. Russia, I believe, should clearly say and the international community should clearly say to Russia that it has defined borders that will not be questioned, because disputed borders lie at the core of most conflicts and wars.

I learned that manual labor really sucks.