She claimed somebody tried to murder her.

She declared that she was not guilty.

In that context she claims that

She alleges that she is still being sought by the Iranian authorities.

The complainant merely alleges that she was subjected to police surveillance.

She claims that her husband is a victim of human rights violations by Guyana.

She makes no claim to have been subjected to house arrest or prevented from leaving Spain.

She complains that her notions of life don't accord with her actions.

The Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs brought charges against Rukiqi based on an investigative judge s claim that Rukiqi had insulted her by saying she had behaved like a policeman.

His girlfriend had alleged that he punched her in the face.

She claims that L. F. refused her offer to be compensated for half of the value of the apartment and turn over ownership to her.

The author states that her son admitted to being present at the scene of each of the two murders, and to robbery, but maintains his innocence in relation to the two murders.

If she's sweet on you like you claim, it'll be easy.

The author was presented the text and she made a note that she disagrees with the requirements of paragraph 2 (d).

In this sense, she claims that the State party would be responsible for a repetition of such unlawful detention.

She claimed the money was going towards a headstone for her son, Lee Skeldon, who died in a car crash in 2013.

On 31 March 1998, she filed a complaint with the Rector, claiming that his decision was illegal.

She brought the case before a District Court claiming discrimination and requested legal aid.

She also claims that Hungary has been bound by the Convention since becoming party to it in 1982.

In the particulars of her claim, the author only announced that she would use documentary evidence and witnesses.

She claimed that she had witnessed the incident, that there had been no confrontation and that her son had never removed his own machete from his bag.

As a rule, they claim that they came here by their own free will, that they did their best to meet all requirements prescribed by law for a legitimate stay, that they were fine, that they had the opportunity to earn some money, that they did not want to return to their country because they were faced with poverty there, or unsettled family conditions, etc.

It has been shown that, on arrival in Spain, the complainant was not handed over to the police services as she claims, but was released to her family.

A 36.2 share of women claim they have been subjected to financial and occupational discriminations, because of their gender.

When she saw me, she screamed.

6.3 The author points to a number of circumstances which she claims demonstrate that her son did not benefit from the presumption of innocence.

3.1 The author claims that her husband was beaten and ill treated by police officers during interrogations at the police station.

She claims to be a victim of violations by the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.

She claims that the State party passively neglected its positive obligations under the Convention and supported the continuation of a situation of domestic violence against her.

Since the complainant did not take those steps, she did not indicate the personal risks to which she now claims to have been exposed.

I call this hypersonic sound.

Yes, that was me. What?

Says he was robbed.

And she's pretty happy.

During the interviews for the re advertised post, the author claims, she was told that she was overqualified

These are also called mesh networks.

Error while loading the sound names.

2.2 The author states that her son's trial was unfair and that he was unjustly convicted of murder.

She further claims that there was no evidence of the murders being committed in aggravating circumstances, as found by the Court.

She didn't say a word, but there was a look in her eyes...

She cursed loudly.

It's picking up her heartbeat.

Since that date, and on the basis of the earlier attacks and verbal threats by her former partner, the author claims that her physical integrity, physical and mental health and life have been at serious risk and that she lives in constant fear.

2.2 The author claims that all her applications have been denied, without any lawful or legitimate grounds.

But the victim refused to press charges because she claimed that law enforcement had permanently altered her memory through the use of Frederick's photograph.