Secondly, expansion of the Security Council should be carried out in both categories of membership, permanent and non permanent.

The enlargement of the Council should be carried out in both categories of membership, permanent and non permanent.

Option 1 Increase of permanent and non permanent membership

However, there must also be an increase in the permanent as well as the non permanent membership, with the inclusion of developing countries among the permanent members.

Finland therefore supports an enlargement of the Council in the number of both permanent and non permanent members.

Asia would have two additional permanent seats and one additional non permanent seat.

III. Issues related to the increase of permanent and non permanent membership

That's not common sense.

The vulgar herd can never understand.

We are of the view that there should be an expansion of both the permanent and the non permanent membership of the Council.

Finland therefore supports an enlargement of the Council in both the permanent and the non permanent categories.

The Security Council should be expanded to include new permanent and non permanent members.

Kiribati supports an expansion of the permanent and non permanent membership of the Security Council.

It must include the expansion of the Security Council in both the permanent and non permanent categories of membership.

New permanent members should enjoy the same rights as current permanent members.

1.1 Permanent membership

Three in all. Well, that's very reasonable, Paul.

It simply is not within the realm of possibility!

Expanding the number of permanent and non permanent members is essential to achieve balance in the Security Council.

The first is, forget about kicking. Very counterintuitive.

A woman can always find an excuse not to make love.

Among them is that the Council consists of both permanent and non permanent members and that the permanent members have certain privileges, most notably the veto power.

(i) The five permanent members of the Security Council

An expansion in the permanent and non permanent categories will provide balance in the Council.

(a) Enlarge the Security Council in both the permanent and non permanent categories and improve on its working methods

Generic Project Manager

1.2 Non permanent members

No, but it's against common sense.

Yes, I understand quite well.

You handled that very well.

The new permanent and non permanent members joining the Council as part of this expansion should receive the same prerogatives as current permanent members.

We appreciate the aspirations of India and Brazil to undertake the honourable responsibility of permanent membership, and we agree that Africa's representation in both categories of membership is long overdue.

It calls for two permanent seats, with the prerogatives and privileges of permanent membership, and five non permanent seats for Africa.

Is a new permanent member really a permanent member if it does not have the same powers as the original five permanent members?

In that context, we believe that the Security Council needs to be enlarged in both the permanent and non permanent categories of membership.

(i) Two permanent seats and two non permanent seats for African States

(ii) Two permanent seats and one non permanent seat for Asian States

(i) Two permanent seats and two non permanent seats for African States

(ii) Two permanent seats and one non permanent seat for Asian States

(a) That the new permanent members should have the same responsibilities and obligations as the current permanent members

The United States takes its responsibilities as a permanent member of the Security Council very seriously.

3. New permanent members should be granted the same prerogatives and powers as the current permanent members.

He shall be Executive President of the Standing Council, whose agenda he shall prepare.

It was very brute force it was very inelegant.

The permanent members of the Council took their seats in a distant and very different age.