1. The State responsible for an internationally wrongful act is under an obligation to give satisfaction for the injury caused by that act insofar as it cannot be made good by restitution or compensation.

3. Satisfaction shall not be out of proportion to the injury and may not take a form humiliating to the responsible State.

Now I think we're missing a trick here, because I don't think people like Max Vision should be in jail.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no award of compensation for this loss type.

The E4 Panel recommended compensation for loss of tangible property, but not for loss of stock, when it reviewed the claim.

An award for damages was meant as a means of repairing a wrong, not as wage replacement and so M.B. was not in a position of double recovery for the same loss.

UNHCR could not compute their aggregate amount, because it had not requested its field offices to report them.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends that no compensation be awarded for this loss.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no award of compensation for business losses.

More pressure has to be exerted on parties to conflict in order to make them realize that the costs of using child soldiers outweigh the benefits.

Asserts that Azerbaijan is entitled to receiving adequate compensation for the damage it sustained and considers that it is the responsibility of the Republic of Armenia to give full compensation for such damage.

The Panel therefore recommends no award of compensation in respect of business losses.

By Procedural Order No. 6 of the fourth F4 instalment dated 30 April 2004, the Panel deferred the portion of claim No. 5000259 of Kuwait relating to remediation of coastal mudflats to the fifth F4 instalment.

Subject matter Loss of property in Angola by Portuguese citizens at the time of decolonization by Portugal and non compensation for losses constituting a possible case of discrimination

Considering the right of any person not to be subjected to enforced disappearance, the right of victims to justice and to reparation,

The Panel reviewed the claim file and concluded that the correct amount of compensation recommended for the claimant's D1 losses should have been USD 10,000 and for the claimant's D4 losses should have been USD 25,739.64.

This is without prejudice to the use of such information in criminal proceedings relating to an enforced disappearance and to the exercise of the right to obtain reparation.

With regard to the admissibility of claims for loss of life and reduced quality of life, the Claimants maintain that loss of life and reduced quality of life are clearly and properly compensable by the Commission.

(a) Does not permit any injured State to recover, by way of compensation, more than the damage it has suffered

As a result of these findings, the Panel recommends no award of compensation for the asserted business losses.

5.7 As a result of the foregoing, the author seeks declarations of violations of the Covenant, compensation for legal costs and appropriate compensation, including for lost salary.

Neither unidentified claimants who obtained compensation for lost securities nor claimants who obtained restitution for the confiscation of Jewish property could be deemed suitable groups of comparison, in the absence of any indication of the criteria on which the differential treatment was allegedly based, and since Jewish compensation claims for war induced losses concerned an entirely different situation subject to distinct legislation.

Syria concludes that this indicates degradation that probably was the result of pollution which occurred prior to 1992 and has not been repeated since.

The Panel reviewed the file and concluded that the correct amount of compensation recommended for the DS losses should have been USD 1,038.06.

The Panel reviewed the file and concluded that the correct amount of compensation recommended for the D6 losses should have been USD 51,542.

The E4 Panel recommended no compensation for loss of stock and loss of profits when it reviewed the claim.

According to the Claimants, all losses that were a direct result of Iraq's illegal acts must be compensated in order to wipe out all the consequences of those illegal acts.

And there (in the Torah) We had ordained for them a life for a life, and an eye for an eye, and a nose for a nose, and an ear for an ear, and a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds retribution, though he who forgoes it out of charity, atones for his sins. And those who do not judge by God's revelations are unjust.

And in the Taurat, We made it obligatory upon them that, A life (is the retribution) for a life, and an eye for an eye, and a nose for a nose, and an ear for an ear, and a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds is a retribution then whoever willingly agrees to retribution, it shall redeem him of his sin and whoever does not judge according to what is sent down by Allah it is they who are the unjust.

And therein We prescribed for them 'A life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds retaliation' but whosoever forgoes it as a freewill offering, that shall be for him an expiation. Whoso judges not according to what God has sent down they are the evildoers.

And We prescribed unto them therein a life for a life, and an eye for an eye, and a nose for a nose, and an ear for an ear, and a tooth for a tooth, and wounds in reprisal, then whosoever forgoeth it, then it shall be for him an expiation. And whosoever judgeth not by that which Allah hath sent down those then! they are the wrong doers.

And We ordained therein for them Life for life, eye for eye, nose for nose, ear for ear, tooth for tooth, and wounds equal for equal. But if anyone remits the retaliation by way of charity, it shall be for him an expiation. And whosoever does not judge by that which Allah has revealed, such are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong doers of a lesser degree).

And We wrote for them in it a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and an equal wound for a wound but whoever forgoes it in charity, it will serve as atonement for him. Those who do not rule according to what God revealed are the evildoers.

And therein We had ordained for them 'A life for a life, and an eye for an eye, and a nose for a nose, and an ear for an ear, and a tooth for a tooth, and for all wounds, like for like. But whosoever forgoes it by way of charity, it will be for him an expiation. Those who do not judge by what Allah has revealed are indeed the wrong doers.

And We prescribed for them therein The life for the life, and the eye for the eye, and the nose for the nose, and the ear for the ear, and the tooth for the tooth, and for wounds retaliation. But whoso forgoeth it (in the way of charity) it shall be expiation for him. Whoso judgeth not by that which Allah hath revealed such are wrong doers.

In it We prescribed for them a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, and an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and retaliation for wounds. Yet whoever remits it out of charity, that shall be an atonement for him. Those who do not judge by what Allah has sent down it is they who are the wrongdoers.

We have written for them a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds equal retaliation, but whosoever forgoes it as a freewill offering, it will be an expiation for him. Whoever does not judge according to what Allah has sent down are the harmdoers.

And We ordained for them therein a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds is legal retribution. But whoever gives up his right as charity, it is an expiation for him. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed then it is those who are the wrongdoers.

In the Torah We made mandatory for the Jews these rules of retaliation Capital punishment for the murder of a person an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and a just compensation for a wound. If the perpetrator is forgiven by the affected party, this will be an expiation of his crime. Those who do not judge according to what God has revealed are unjust.

And We prescribed to them in it that life is for life, and eye for eye, and nose for nose, and ear for ear, and tooth for tooth, and (that there is) reprisal in wounds but he who foregoes it, it shall be an expiation for him and whoever did not judge by what Allah revealed, those are they that are the unjust.

We prescribed for them in the Torah a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and a wound for a wound. But, if anyone forgoes it, this shall be for him an expiation. Those who do not judge by what God has sent down are wrongdoers!

We ordained therein for them Life for life, eye for eye, nose or nose, ear for ear, tooth for tooth, and wounds equal for equal. But if any one remits the retaliation by way of charity, it is an act of atonement for himself. And if any fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (No better than) wrong doers.

The Panel reviewed the file and concluded that the correct amount of compensation recommended for the D8 D9 losses should have been USD 82,214.53.

In M.B. v. British Columbia, the British Columbia Court of Appeal concluded that that the social assistance benefits were not deductible from an award for damages (for sexual assault).

The Panel finds that each of these losses fails, as claimants have either failed to clearly describe a loss or to prove the essential legal requirements of ownership, loss or causation.