Noting also that at the time of filing, the secretariat and the claimants were not aware that the consolidation would have consequences regarding the payment of the claim and that had separate claims been filed rather than a consolidated claim, the claimants would have been paid in full by mid 2003,

The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim provided additional evidence and claimed for losses in addition to those losses claimed by the E4 claimant.

A total of 37 confirmed matches were identified, which related either to claims filed by the same claimant within the bedoun programme or to claims filed by the same claimant in different claim categories.

Claimants were instructed to appear in person in order to file a claim.

matching claims Two or more claims filed by a claimant during the regular filing period and under the late claims programme.

Claimants whose spouses filed claims during the regular filing period

Some claims in the fourth instalment lacked either (a) the claimant's signature affirming the information provided in the claim and the losses being claimed, or (b) evidence of authority on the part of the individual who filed the claim on behalf of the claimant.

These claims lack either the claimant's signature or evidence of authority to act on the part of the individual who filed the claim on behalf of the claimant.

Some of these identifiers are included in the claim form submitted by the claimant the remaining data is taken from the evidence provided by a claimant either in the original claim or in response to claim development notifications.

The Claimants assert that international law has consistently taken the view that injury to a national of one State by another State gives rise to a claim that belongs to the State of the national and not to the injured person.

However, 14 of these claimants filed duplicative claims in the bedoun programme, reducing the number of claims filed by such claimants to 29,051.

However, 11 of these claimants filed duplicative claims in the bedoun programme, reducing the number of claims filed by such claimants to 387.

However, 10 of these claimants filed duplicative claims in the bedoun programme, reducing the number of claims filed by such claimants to 1,436.

In its First Report, the Panel determined that claimants who filed claims during the regular filing period in the same claim category had a full and effective opportunity to file claims with the Commission at that time.

duplicate claims Two or more claims filed by a claimant under the late claims programme in the same category.

The Panel reviewed the overlapping claims together to determine which of the losses claimed by the category C claimant should be consolidated with the E4 claim for review.

In one claim, a husband who filed a category A claim during the regular filing period explained that he was unable to file a category C claim at the same time because no claim forms were available.

The E4 claims population consists of claims submitted by Kuwaiti private sector corporations and entities, other than oil sector and environmental claims, eligible to file claims under the Commission's Claim Forms for Corporations and Other Entities ( Form E ).

The E4 population consists of claims submitted by, or on behalf of, Kuwaiti private sector corporations and entities, other than oil sector and environmental claimants, eligible to file claims under the Commission's Claim Forms for Corporations and Other Entities .

Iraq also objects to Saudi Arabia's two category transect classification approach, in which transects are described either as non recovering or as recovering disturbed .

C3 Death claims seek compensation for the death of a spouse, child or parent of the claimant.

The majority of the claims in the fourthsecond group of overlapping claims were filed by an E4 claimant and an individual claimant who was a shareholder of the E4 claimant company.

FOR DAMAGES UP TO USD 100,000 (CATEGORY C CLAIMS)

However, two of these claimants filed duplicative claims in the bedoun programme, reducing the number of claims filed by such claimants to 957.

By contrast, in one set of potentially overlapping claims, the Panel reached the conclusion that the claims were overlapping, despite the individual claimant's assertion that his claim was mistakenly filed in the name of the E4 claimant.

Duplicate claims are two or more claims filed by an individual in the same claims category.

32.4 A Party to the Convention asserting a claim pursuant to this Article shall submit its claim in writing to any Annex _ Party against whom it makes such claim within six years following the year for which the claim is made.

A Party to the Convention asserting a claim pursuant to this Article shall submit its claim in writing to any Annex _ Party against whom it makes such claim within six years following the year for which the claim is made.

The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim provided additional evidence (motor vehicle deregistration certificates) and claimed for losses in addition to those losses claimed by the E4 claimant.

The partnership agreement referenced in the court documents is signed by the Kuwaiti claimant's husband and specifically refers to the business that the Kuwaiti claimant claimed for in her claim.

The secretariat identified 25 category A claims filed by the Government of the Sudan for a high amount by claimants that had also filed claims in other claim categories.

More than 900,000 category A compensation claims were submitted by claimants.

The E4 claimant Al Nuwaisib Building Requirement was originally considered in the eighteenth instalment of E4 claims where it had been considered as overlapping with a category C claim filed by a different individual claimant.

The first step was the electronic matching of claims and the manual verification of matches in order to identify those claims filed under the late claims programme by claimants who previously filed claims during the regular filing period.

Noting also that the failure of these first in time competing claimants to return the overpayments has resulted in a situation where second in time competing claimants have ongoing competing claims related suspensions on payments,

All category F claimants were required to submit with the ir claim forms ... a separate Statement of Claim which had to include the following particulars

A number of such claims have been filed, principally by Kuwait, on behalf of claimants since the end of the regular filing period.

The inability to obtain a claim form is a satisfactory explanation for failure to file a claim.

Having reviewed 40 claims submitted by the Government of the Philippines, one claim submitted by the Government of India and 20 claims submitted by the Government of Jordan, the secretariat confirms that they are, indeed, duplicates and should not have been awarded compensation.

Claimants had the option to file departure related losses for family members who should have been listed in the claim form.

The evidence provided by the claimant in support of this claim indicated that a multiplier of 10 should have been used to calculate the compensation for this claim.

Overall, there are 31,31,70 claims that the Panel has determined to be ineligible for inclusion in the late claims programme because the claimants failed to provide satisfactory reasons for late filing.

The Panel is satisfied that these claims do not present any risk of duplication of awards.

Damage claims filed.

Filing of claims by representation