Such notes, according to the Claimant, ultimately ended up in the hands of the Sri Lankan refugees.

Iraq notes that there are no categories that are described as fully recovered or normal baseline .

The fourthsecond group of overlapping claims initially consisted of E4 claims related to 39seven category C claims and 24 category C and D claims.

The E4 claimant Al Nuwaisib Building Requirement was originally considered in the eighteenth instalment of E4 claims where it had been considered as overlapping with a category C claim filed by a different individual claimant.

SudanOne claim originally reported in the fourth instalment was found to be a duplicate of a claim also reported in the same instalment.

E4 claimant Ali Muowar Mohammed Kharma Industrial Equipment Co. was originally considered in the second instalment of E4 claims.

Claim No. 5000464 is for public health expenses resulting from the influx of refugees.

The largest number of duplicates affected category A claims, where several countries were found to have submitted a number of claims more than once.

At the time that the F3 Panel made its recommendations in respect of the original F3 claim, the claimed amount in respect of the family support payments aspect of the original F3 claim had risen to USD 69,680,679, plus a daily amount of USD 22,411 into the future.

The claims included in this instalment represent the losses most frequently suffered by category C claimants.

As the category D Palestinian late claims were not filed until the end of the regular category D work programme, matches between regular and Palestinian category D claims were identified upon review of the latter claims.

Further, the Panel finds that to rely on the revised category D claim and its supporting evidence would be tantamount to allowing the individual claimant to file a new claim after the deadline for filing of claims.

Notwithstanding the prior status of the awards as final, the Panel was required to re examine such E4 claims with reference to the potentially overlapping category C and category D claims, as a consequence of the direction contained in decision 123.

Iran, therefore, could have included these claim units in the submissions that it filed within these deadlines.

Of the 4 claims, three claims have been satisfied, while in one case court proceedings have been closed.

The Panel's review of the original F3 claim

At times the claim preparers appeared to be more familiar with the claims than the claimants.

In the view of the Panel, this should involve the services of a qualified senior epidemiologist.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

Only two claims are larger than 10 million, while the next ranking claim is about 6 million.

Although the category D Panel (the D' Panel ) began its review of claims in 1996, the first five instalments of category D claims did not include any claims for business losses.

Higher incentives may be required where there is evidence that reduction in livestock ownership affects an individual's social standing in the community.

One claim in the sixth instalment was found to be a duplicate of a claim awarded compensation in the fifth instalment.

The largest group of claims consists of the 29,051 claims that were previously determined to be provisionally eligible as a result of the electronic application of the Governing Council's eligibility criteria to each claimant's data in the PACI database.

Sample materials were extracted from the core of the blocks and from their undamaged surfaces.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE PANEL OF COMMISSIONERS CONCERNING THE FOURTH INSTALMENT OF INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES UP TO US 100,000 (CATEGORY C CLAIMS)

A total of 37 confirmed matches were identified, which related either to claims filed by the same claimant within the bedoun programme or to claims filed by the same claimant in different claim categories.

The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim provided additional evidence and claimed for losses in addition to those losses claimed by the E4 claimant.

Third F4 instalment, claim No. 5000450 and fourth F4 instalment, claim Nos. 5000454 and 5000466.

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012259 the claimant seeks compensation of USD 4,930,795 for business losses.

The evidence in the claim file includes payroll records and employment contracts, termination notices prepared by the claimant's personnel division, letters from the claimant to its bank requesting payment of the claimed amounts to the relevant employees and, in a number of cases, bank debit advices indicating that payment was made in accordance with the claimant's instructions.

This aspect of the original F3 claim was remitted to the Registrar of the Commission, allocated a new claim number, and set aside for future review (the current F3' claim ).

These claims lack either the claimant's signature or evidence of authority to act on the part of the individual who filed the claim on behalf of the claimant.

Table 1. Losses claimed by the National Committee in the original F3 claim

The Panel of Commissioners determined that the 26 category C Palestinian late claims had met the threshold eligibility requirement and recommended awards of compensation for the claims.

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3011224 the claimant asserted, in addition to her own losses, a salary loss on behalf of her husband.

First F4 instalment, claim No. 5000405.

In twofive of the individual claims identified as potentially overlapping with E4 claims, the Panel considers that the claim wass were not overlapping as the individual claimant was weres claiming losses that were related to the E4 claimant companies but were not overlapping losses (for example, where the individual claimant is seeking compensation for a loss of salary or management fee from the E4 claimant).

The average amount claimed for the claims in this instalment is about USD 2 million, compared to about USD 820,000 for all claims, about USD 934,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 861,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme.

The median amount claimed is about USD 470,000 for claims in this instalment, compared with about USD 263,000 for all claims, about USD 335,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 276,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme Approximately 75 per cent of the claims in this instalment contain D8 D9 business losses in relation to unincorporated establishments in Kuwait.

3. Decides that, for purposes of payment of the successful claimants, the claims included in the final report shall be considered as part of the fifth instalment of category C claims,

Specifically, the secretariat, in valuing the claimant's D6 (loss of income) claim, incorrectly treated it as a duplicate of the claimant's C6 (salary loss) claim, resulting in an erroneous reduction of the amount of compensation awarded to the claimant for his C6 claim.

The review of this claim confirms that technical errors occurred during the processing of the claim for which an amount of USD 1,544,699,253 was originally recommended by the Panel.

The review of the claim confirms that a technical error occurred during the processing of the claim for which an amount of USD 362,792,000 was originally recommended by the Panel.

duplicate claims Two or more claims filed by a claimant under the late claims programme in the same category.