But this conflict of views is kind of interesting.

It only took one robust observation from Copernicus to blow that idea out of the water.

So there's another thing that comes up with basics.

I'm not happy with that sentiment at all.

The material I'm going to show you is one idea from a book with a lot of ideas.

Armenia counts on a network of as many as 45 meteorological stations, 3 climatic stations, and 70 meteorological, 105 river and 7 lake observation sites.

Observations were made in agreement with the idea set forth in paragraph 8, the view being expressed that that idea should be further developed and elaborated upon.

This class cannot wait to read A Tale of Two Cities, and Lou Martin made a joke with a point, a serious point.

And in the northern hemisphere there are four sites.

That would be a mildly arrogant viewpoint.

Several other speakers supported that point of view.

As to the question that all human rights were individual rights and that there was no need for collective rights, that was only one point of view and one which was not universally accepted.

A Watchpoint has been hit by the debugger

SB I think a point of difference we're having, Mark, has to do with weapons and energy.

The nineteenth century philosopher John Stuart Mill had a more civilized view

She noted that there were two States in particular who continued not to accept this view.

So here's one last thought, which was said much, much better 25 years ago in the U.S. National Academy report than I can say today.

And everyone here is unfortunately carrying that habitual perception, a little bit, right?

And my son, youngest son who studied in Beijing, in China, he got a long term perspective.

That's just not acceptable to intelligent Christians, and we must acknowledge it.

Another reviewer called it hilarious.

And in it also brings up another point, right here.

I'm an influence, a wielder of opinion.

And their individual visions, and their engagement with this mathematical mode.

There was a dramatic illustration of this actually a year ago Copenhagen, climate change conference.

The first argument is based upon a static view of the world.

And, of course, it's one that's dear to my heart, because all of these sentiments some banal, some a bit more profound all originally had come out of my diary.

It was very controversial to say three, four, five years ago.

And from that point of view we turned it into a lovely project.

Choices had to be made between the confinement to purely local points of view and the adoption of a more global perspective.

I think some people agree with me.

They therefore offered a good starting point for further discussion of that complex issue.

The idea is like this.

That's a stunning vision.

This view was supported by the observer for Finland.

An idea is a greater monument than a cathedral.

The reason I've taken this time is I've been fascinated to hear some of the reactions to this.

Now, in one sense, the claim that history has a direction is not that controversial.

Here's the best part None of what I'm telling you is my opinion.

And going a little closer, you get a different perspective.

That is this new idea about how gravity actually works.

So another one that comes up is Computers dumb math down.

First of all, a little bit of audience participation.

And then finally, we're going to try to develop and pioneer a new perspective on high seas governance that's rooted in ocean basin wide conservation, but framed in an arena of global norms of precaution and respect.

Artist Raghava KK demos his new children's book for iPad with a fun feature when you shake it, the story and your perspective changes. In this charming short talk, he invites all of us to shake up our perspective a little bit.