There was nothing that you could prove.

Unsupported by one shred of evidence...

Is there any evidence to substantiate your story?

There was no compelling reason why certification authorities should be subject to a regime of strict liability.

He didn't have any regular identification.

What is more, there are no witnesses to testify

Evidence means nothing.

The remote host did not send any SSL certificates. Aborting because the identity of the host cannot be established.

The test indicated that there was no trace of poisoning.

We've got nothing on her. This isn't evidence.

(5) to the certification authority apos s knowledge, there are no known, material facts omitted from the certificate which would, if known, adversely affect the reliability of the foregoing representations.

The post mortem had not found any evidence of torture.

And we didn't have the evidence for that.

Sorry, no certificates were found in this message.

Anyhow, I haven't got one shred of evidence against you.

It was suggested that any certification authority, when issuing a certificate, should be under an obligation which might read as follows

I don't see any reason why this witness should not be qualified to give evidence.

The author reiterates that there was no evidence against him.

And you don't have any alibi. Or prove me wrong.

Error Signature not verified

If would be difficult for domestic certification authorities to assume liability for certificates issued abroad without a common ground concerning the types of warranties offered by certification authorities.

On 18 June 1997 the Government reported that there were no indications of this person having been detained and that he had not produced any evidence to support his allegations.

That's all very well, Professor, but have you any proof?

I don't have to prove anything!

(2) The register shall be maintained by the certification authority for at least 10 years after the date of revocation or expiry of the operational period of any certificate issued by that certification authority.

No public certificate to verify the signature

No appropriate authentication mechanism available.

Reservations were expressed, however, about the possibility that a certification authority might avoid liability for its own negligence by virtue of liability exemption clauses or disclaimers contained in the certification practice statement or in any other document issued by that certification authority.

The Government replied that an inquiry by the superintendent of Pulwama Police district revealed that no case had been registered in regard to the police station concerned and that there was no material evidence to establish the guilt of army personnel.

Among those already determined ineligible are many persons who joined the force during the conflict, without any previous experience or training.

Neither does it have any experience of dealing with the humanitarian aspects of any convention banning the use of landmines.

The State has not produced one iota... of medical evidence... that the crime Tom Robinson is charged with... ever took place.

There was no evidence implying the responsibility of any police official.

There is no evidence that their content was interfered with.

He further reiterates that there was no proof against him.

No identifying documents or weapons were found on the body.

You were not supposed to talk about anything that you couldn't demonstrate.

This proceeding was held without any prior notice, without a lawyer and without any witnesses to prove that the gun was his.

His concern is buttressed by the fact that diplomatic assurances are not legally binding and thus have no sanctions for their violation.

No authentication details supplied.

There being no proof of who had written the signatures, the element of doubt favoured the authors.

How is the authenticity or validity of a license to posses a firearm verified?

Yeah, she hasn't got any evidence. That's why she's pushing off.

Perhaps though I can't believe it but perhaps he was Albert Langlois.

There had been no evidence of intimidation or any climate of fear or uncertainty on the part of voters.