The idea is like this.

And this is the main objection to the theory.

One of the things that underpins it is this idea of resilience.

So you agree with Nietzsche and his theory of the superman.

Here is the new idea of string theory.

(iii) Perspective of the administering Powers

(ii) Perspective of the Non Self Governing Territories

And it was my theory, or my point of view, that one didn't upstage the neighborhood one made accommodations.

His argument is rational.

You could see arguments on both sides.

That's the argument I want to make tonight.

Another reviewer called it hilarious.

The first argument is based upon a static view of the world.

And we think in a gene centric view maybe going back to Richard Dawkins' ideas than in a genome centric view, which are different constructs of these gene components.

The idea is that such intellectual cross fertilization would help students understand recent economic phenomena better and improve economic theory. From this point of view, everyone stands to benefit from curriculum reform.

Regardless of one's views, any mechanisms for employee involvement in the governance of the enterprise should be clearly disclosed.

Theories of organizational learning need to be seen as adding value to, rather than conflicting with, existing market oriented views of development.

Provide on the other hand elements on what works to counter fatalistic perceptions.

Whatever view one took of the conflict, nothing could justify the situation in the camps.

The German authorities also support the view that the problems should be dealt with case by case and not lumped together on a general basis.

What I'm going to show you next are a couple of controversial ideas.

It should be opinion driven less news, more views.

So when we talk about the extra dimensions in string theory, it's not one extra dimension, as in the older ideas of Kaluza and Klein.

One reviewer for a Roman Catholic newspaper called it totalitarian.

I find this extremely important, because democracy is about people changing their views based on rational arguments and discussions.

I think that's the main point to be made.

The arguments of the majority are, in any case, subjective and do not represent an objective analysis of treaty norms.

Now this sounds a little theoretical, but it's not so theoretical.

Ideas of tolerance and co existence should be encouraged and mutual understanding on different religions be deepened through public debate and exchange of thoughts.

As radical as such an approach might seem from a dogmatic point of view, it seemed to square with the direction followed by States in practice.

Whatever opinion on the proposed new shape of the Security Council one may have, one thing is obvious.

And this links up with a lot of the other ideas that have been talked about.

They are similar to those advanced by Ethiopia in discussions with the Commission in the period since the April Decision .

Europe began its own American style debate on the origins of life when Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna cast doubt on the acceptability of Darwinism and evolutionary theory to people who see themselves as faithful Roman Catholics. The Cardinal argued that evolution is the work of God and that evolutionary theory should be interpreted in that light and no other.

We wish, in particular, to thank the special panellists who spoke to the Council earlier and added valuable points of view to our deliberations.

The usefulness of Economic and Social Council agreed conclusion 1997 2 on gender mainstreaming was emphasized.

Gender mainstreaming is one of the focal points in policy discussions with multilateral organisations.

(c) When members of the Committee participate in other human rights activities of intergovernmental organizations such as training courses and seminars, they should make it clear that the views they are expressing are their own and not the views of the Committee.

The idea that developing countries are struggling to retain economic sovereignty was therefore considered specious.

To meet these cases a code of rules, well thought out from the practical as well as from the scientific point of view, is much wanted.

Let's consider for a while the option of monotasking.

It's only a theory.

It was felt that the mainstreaming of gender issues should have been reflected in the report.

Now my perspective is a particularly my perspective is a particularly American perspective.

Depending on which macroeconomic theory one held, both could be presented as pro growth policies. The first might cause the economy to expand, because the government was increasing public spending the second, because they were cutting it.