A very simple equation.

It's a partial differential equation.

So the equation is conceptual.

It's been very productive, that equation.

Ultimately, we are dealing here with an equation where all the factors are known in other words, an equation without unknowns.

So let me stretch out that equation.

Let's go back and visit our equation.

But this part of the equation I didn't really get, and I don't think my physicians really get this part of the equation.

And when he looked at that equation, it was none other than the equation that scientists had long known to describe the electromagnetic force.

And that changes the equation slightly, doesn't it?

Mathematically, this is expressed by the following equation

This is where America s multilateral trade deficit enters the equation, for it has long accounted for the bulk of America s balance of payments gap. Since 2000, it has made up fully 96 of the cumulative current account shortfall.

So here's the sort of equation we're looking at.

It's called the standard model beautifully simple mathematical equation.

But there's an extra symbol in this equation H.

And I can put it in this simple equation.

All of those things are part of that equation.

Numbers, however, were only one part of the equation.

Judging whether economic interdependence produces power requires looking at the balance of asymmetries, not just at one side of the equation. In this case, interdependence has created a balance of financial terror analogous to the Cold War, when the US and the Soviet Union never used their potential to destroy each other in a nuclear exchange.

And then we'll know the whole equation for the line.

There's a basic equation that we can't get away from.

Rumsfeld may understand this calculus in principle, but his words and actions show that he does not know how to balance the equation in practice. Doing so and thus being in a position to win the war is impossible without soft power.

And that happiness is a whole other end of the equation.

This is the only equation in the talk by the way.

We see that as an equation that equals violence against women.

And on that basis, I've suggested a different kind of equation.

Paul and Anne Ehrlich's environmental impact equation population, affluence and technology.

For us, I think, part of the equation for our survival.

It's stable because all the roots of this equation are negative.

And the mathematicians and scientists in the crowd will recognize these two progressions as a first order discrete differential equation and a second order discrete differential equation, derived by six year olds.

So we figured out the slope of this equation. It's eight five.

In principle, you should be able to calculate it from that equation.

The equation is hidden there, z goes into z squared, plus c.

The next second equation says that there is no magnetism other than that.

I would put it in the following equation no 9 11, no war.

But it is changing the equation of what's rational in sexual decision making.

The mobilization of the demand side of the sustainable tourism equation is crucial.

And we could generate an equation that could predict the likelihood of an attack.

And I think what that does to us psychologically is it creates an equation.

You can make it a quartic equation. Make it kind of harder, calculating wise.

OK, so if we take that equation, why haven't we heard from anybody out there?

This equation, though, allows you to calculate everything other than gravity that happens in the universe.

But the other side of the equation is you've got to come out of your cave.

Again, what it tells us is suddenly we start thinking about both sides of the equation.

Now Google, and Jon Orwant in particular, told us a little equation that we should learn.