"purport"的翻译 使用中文:


  字典 英语-中国人

Purport - translation :

  例子 (外部来源,未经审查)

And surely there hath come unto them news whereof the purport should deter,
包含警戒的许多消息 确已来临他们了
And surely there hath come unto them news whereof the purport should deter,
包含警戒的許多消息 確已來臨他們了
It should be understood accordingly that the list cannot purport to be complete.
一 在2003年6月之前宣布实行紧急状态并在此 之后继续实行紧急状态的国家或地区
An example raised in this regard was the commercially feasible situation where one party might purport to consent to a derogation on behalf of all of its buyers.
在这方面所举的一个例子是一种在商业上可能的情形 即一方可能自称代表其所有买方同意某项删减
A judicial review does not purport to review the facts and is an extraordinary remedy in respect of which the Court has a discretion to grant or not to grant the remedy.
司法审查的宗旨并不是要审查事实 而且是一种特别的补救措施 法院有权利准许或不准许提供补救措施
The Vienna Conventions do not otherwise purport to regulate the consequences of an outbreak of hostilities nor do they contain any general reservation with regard to the effect of that event on the application of their provisions.
除此以外 维也纳公约 不拟对爆发敌对行动的后果作出规定 也没有就这种情况对施行公约条款所造成的影响作出任何一般保留
In this regard, the Panel recalls its previous statements that paragraph 35 of Governing Council decision 7 does not purport to give an exhaustive list of the activities and events that can give rise to compensable losses or expenses.
在这方面 小组回顾早先提出的意见 即 赔偿委员会理事会第7号决定第35段无意详尽无遗地列出可引起应予赔偿损失或费用的活动和事件
There is abundant evidence that treaties which in express terms purport to regulate the relations of the contracting parties during a war, including the actual conduct of warfare, remain in force during war and do not require revival after its termination.
大量证据显示 明示其目的在于规定战争期间 包括实际作战期间各缔约方之间的关系的条约在战争期间仍然有效 在战争结束后无需恢复
The Oscar winning documentary Inside Job raised some sensitivities and led to increased disclosures by some people, including academics, concerning their involvement with the financial industry. But there remain profound monetary ties between big banks and people who purport to be independent analysts providing expert opinions.
奥斯卡获奖纪录片 监守自盗 Inside Job 曝光了一些敏感信息 并引来一些人的进一步披露 包括因身涉金融业而担忧不已的学者 但在大银行和理应以独立分析员的身份提供专家意见的人之间仍存在深刻的金钱联系 一些官员仍是金融业的俘虏
This proposition will be found on careful examination to express, in condensed form, the essential purport of the Theory, and to express in a few words all Mr. Darwin s meaning who, by a strange inversion of reasoning, seems to think Absolute Ignorance fully qualified to take the place of Absolute Wisdom in the achievements of creative skill.
这种说法被建立在详尽的研究之上 来传达这个理论的要义 也传达了达尔文先生的全部意思 他用这样一种奇怪的 反向逻辑 似乎认为 绝对的无知 完全有资格取代 绝对的智慧 来完成需要创造性技能的工作
Thus, the Geneva conventions codifying the law of the sea contain no reservation in regard to the case of an outbreak of hostilities notwithstanding the obvious impact which such an event may have on the application of many provisions of those Conventions nor do they purport in any way to regulate the consequences of such an event.
所以 制定海洋法的维也纳各项公约没有对爆发敌对行动的情况作出保留规定 尽管这种情况显然会对公约许多条款的实施造成影响 公约也不打算对这种情况的后果作出任何规定
Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War and have no legal effect
4. 确定占领国以色列已采取或将采取的旨在改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰的特征和法律地位的一切立法和行政措施和行动均属无效 公然违反国际法和 关于战时保护平民的日内瓦公约 故无任何法律效力
Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,3 and have no legal effect
3. 确定占领国以色列已采取或将采取的意图改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰的特征和法律地位的所有立法和行政措施和行动均属无效 构成公然违反国际法及1949年8月12日 关于战时保护平民之日内瓦公约 3 的行为 没有任何法律效力
Under such circumstances, it seems surprising that article 9, in paragraphs 4 and 5, should purport to define the electronic equivalent of an original when it does not make such equivalence subject to the requirement of singularity of the original, which is intrinsically linked to the very function and nature of an original, and will thus be unable to address the question of the transfer of a negotiable instrument.
在这种情况下 第9条第4和第5款在没有将这种等同性置于正本的独一无二性要求的约束下就试图定义正本的电子等同物 似乎有些令人吃惊 因为这种独一无二性与正本的确切功能和性质有着内在联系 因此这两款也将无法解决流通票据的转让问题
Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,3 and have no legal effect
6. 再次吁请各会员国不承认任何上述立法或行政措施和行动
Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,3 and have no legal effect
3. 确定占领国以色列已采取或将采取的意图改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰的特征和法律地位的所有立法和行政措施和行动均属无效 构成公然违反国际法及1949年8月12日 关于战时保护平民之日内瓦公约 3 的行为 没有任何法律效力
Obviously, article 9 does not purport to answer all the technical and legal questions that may be raised by the use of EDI or other non traditional methods of communication in the context of procurement proceedings, and different areas of the law would apply to ancillary questions such as the electronic issuance of a tender security and other matters that are beyond the sphere of communications under the Model Law.
2. 显然 第9条并非意在回答采购过程中由于应用EDI或其他非传统通信方法而产生的各种技术问题和法律问题 本法其他方面的规定也许可适用于例如以电子手段开立投标担保这一附带问题 以及 示范法 所涉 通信 范围之外的其他事项
3. Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, and have no legal effect
3. 确定占领国以色列已采取或将采取的意图改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰的特征和法律地位的所有立法和行政措施和行动均属无效 构成公然违反国际法及1949年8月12日 关于战时保护平民之日内瓦公约 的行为 没有任何法律效力
3. Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 75, No. 973. and have no legal effect
3. 确定占领国以色列已采取或将采取的意图改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰的特征和法律地位的所有立法和行政方面的措施和行动均属无效 这些行为公然违反国际法及1949年8月12日 关于战时保护平民之日内瓦公约 联合国 条约汇编 第75卷 第973号 因此没有任何法律效力
3. Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 75, No. 973. and have no legal effect
3. 确定占领国以色列已采取或将采取意图改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰地区的特征和法律地位的一切立法和行政措施和行动均属无效 并且公然违反国际法以及1949年8月12日 关于战时保护平民的日内瓦公约 联合国 条约汇编 第75卷 第973号 因而没有法律效力
3. Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 75, No. 973. and have no legal effect
3. 确定占领国以色列已采取或将采取的一切意图改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰的特征和法律地位的立法和行政措施和行动均属无效 构成公然违反国际法及1949年8月12日 关于战时保护平民的日内瓦公约 联合国 条约汇编 第75卷 第973号 的行为 没有任何法律效力
3. Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 75, No. 973. and have no legal effect
3. 确定占领国以色列已采取或将采取的意图改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰的特征和法律地位的所有立法和行政措施和行动均属无效 构成公然违反国际法及1949年8月12日 关于战时保护平民之日内瓦公约 联合国 条约汇编 第75卷 第973号 的行为 没有任何法律效力
3. Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 75, No. 973. and have no legal effect
3. 确定占领国以色列已采取或将采取的意图改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰的特征和法律地位的所有立法和行政措施和行动均属无效 构成公然违反国际法及1949年8月12日 关于战时保护平民之日内瓦公约 联合国 条约汇编 第75 卷 第973号 的行为 没有任何法律效力
3. Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 75, No. 973. and have no legal effect
3. 确定占领国以色列已采取或将采取的意图改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰的特征和法律地位的所有立法和行政措施和行动均属无效 这些行为公然违反国际法及1949年8月12日 关于战时保护平民之日内瓦公约 联合国 条约汇编 第75卷 第973号 因此没有任何法律效力
In resolution 59 125 the General Assembly determined that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, and have no legal effect .
大会第59 125号决议确定 占领国以色列已采取或将采取的意图改变被占领的叙利亚戈兰的特征和法律地位的所有立法和行政措施和行动均属无效 构成公然违反国际法及1949年8月12日 关于战时保护平民之日内瓦公约 的行为 没有任何法律效力

 

Related searches : Purport To Grant - Purport To Provide - Purport To Represent - Does Not Purport - Purport To Assign - Purport To Confer - Purport To Apply - Purport To Exclude - Purport To Act - Purport To Show - Attempt Or Purport