He then used all the appeal procedures available to him, to no avail.

A military judge who heard his appeal on 18 November 1997 decided to release him earlier.

In the author apos s case, the first issue to be determined is whether he was properly notified of the date of his appeal and could prepare his appeal with the lawyer assigned to represent him before the Court of Appeal.

b The author was represented by the same attorney at all stages of the judicial proceedings against him, i.e. preliminary hearing, trial and appeal to the Court of Appeal.

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council denied him special leave to appeal on 10 February 1993.

If I can't stand up to make my final appeal for him, I'll make it sitting down.

The last thing I told him was not to lose heart, that we'd ask for an appeal.

In that connection, the Special Rapporteur requested the Government to inform him of the result of the appeal.

A second letter, dated 18 October 1988, informed him that his appeal was dismissed.

His appeal was also rejected. 2.6 In November 1993, a deportation order was issued against him. His appeal was rejected by the Tribunal Administratif de Versailles.

3.5 As regards the appeal, it is submitted that Mr. Wright was not informed about the date of the appeal hearing, that his lawyer did not consult him before the hearing and that he only learned about the appeal when his lawyer informed him that it had failed.

Three months after his conviction, a legal aid lawyer, who had already represented him before the Assizes Court, was assigned to him in order to represent him again before the Court of Appeal.

As a result of the State party apos s failure to notify him of the date of the appeal, Mr. Kelly could not have consulted with counsel in preparation for the appeal hearing.

the right to appeal.

Even if the Court were now to grant the complainant's appeal, it was unrealistic to imagine that Algeria would return him to France.

He further argues that, since the author had available to him an appeal to the Court of Appeal and to the Privy Council, the Supreme Court would not have exercised its powers, pursuant to section 25, paragraph 2, of the Constitution.

3.3 Furthermore, the author submits that before the Court of Appeal, his counsel, who had not represented him at first instance, made no submissions in support of the appeal.

7.3 As to the author apos s allegation that since he was unaware of the date of his appeal, he could not consult with the attorney for his appeal and the attorney failed to consult with him, the State party reaffirms that since Mr. Kelly was notified of the date of his appeal, that could not have prevented him from consulting with his counsel.

He also claims that the failure of his appeal lawyer to act on the information given to him, his concession to the appeal court that there was no merit in the appeal, and the court apos s failure to replace the lawyer in the light of that concession, amounts to a violation of article 14, paragraph 3 (d).

2.1 A person convicted of any offence by the High Court has the right of appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision of the High Court in convicting him or in deciding on the sentence imposed on him or against both the conviction and sentence.

In this letter, the Ministry advised the author that he could appeal the judgement to the Eastern Division of the High Court and informed him about the statutory deadlines for the filing of such an appeal.

According to the lawyer, Mr. P. did not contact him until after the expiration of the appeal deadline, informing him that he indeed did want to appeal the judgement in this connection, the author told P. H. that he had not reacted earlier because he had been in the United States.

Subsequently, the author contacted a fourth lawyer, who reportedly will represent him before the Court of Appeal.

That ought to appeal to you.

So I appeal to you.

Does that appeal to you?

2.7 On appeal, the author was represented by a different legal aid lawyer, who allegedly did not inform the author about the date of the appeal, did not consult with him and conceded before the court that there were no merits in the appeal.

Based on 2005 Appeal should there be a need to launch another appeal during 2006 2007

The author claims that that showed that the President of the Court of Appeal was biased against him.

If special leave to appeal were granted, a three week period from the granting of special leave to appeal would apply for the filing of the notice of appeal.

I appeal to Eritrea to engage my Special Envoy and to extend to him the necessary cooperation in order to enable him to facilitate the implementation of the Algiers Agreement and the decision of the Boundary Commission.

The applicant, upon receipt of a decision of the Commission which does not satisfy him, may appeal against it to the local court.

You have to appeal to their intellect.

It would have been incumbent upon his representative to inform him of possible avenues of appeal after the authorities apos decision to terminate his employment.

But what did he appeal to?

The Government replied to this appeal.

Lady Loddon I appeal to you...

I will appeal to the Senate.

He notes that he had trusted his lawyer to handle the issue of the appeal contrary to the assertion of the State party and his former representative, he contends that he did contact his lawyer to confirm that he wanted to appeal quot at all cost quot , even though his lawyer had advised him that the chances of succeeding on appeal were slim.

The Court of Appeal of Jamaica dismissed their application for leave to appeal on 12 October 1987.

His application for leave to appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 29 February 1988 a reasoned appeal judgement was issued on 14 March 1988.

The Court of Appeal of Quebec rejected the appeal against the conviction and the Supreme Court of Canada refused the application for leave to appeal against this decision.

Sir, I have come to appeal to you.

9.3 As regards the claim that Mr. Burrell apos s representation on appeal was inadequate, the Committee notes that it appears from the judgement of the Court of Appeal that Mr. Burrell apos s legal aid counsel for the appeal (who had not represented him at the trial) conceded at the hearing that there was no merit in the appeal.

Appeal mechanisms