An Austrian buyer ordered tantal powder from the seller in Hong Kong.

A German buyer ordered to an Austrian seller twenty tons of pork meat.

The Danish buyer only informed the Austrian seller, who then informed the plaintiff.

The buyer notified the lack of conformity of the cooling device to the seller.

A German buyer purchased garments from an Austrian seller, but did not take delivery of the goods.

A French seller and a Spanish buyer concluded a number of contracts for the sale of maize.

According to the appellate court, even a very negligent buyer deserves more protection than a fraudulent seller.

In July 1991 a French seller and a Belgian buyer concluded a contract for the sale of metal sheets.

After requesting the buyer by fax and telephone to take possession, the seller sold the goods to other buyers at a significantly lower price and sued the first buyer to recover the difference between the original agreed price and the actual price the seller had received.

Since the buyer had not effected payment by the agreed date, the seller brought an action for payment against the buyer and his guarantor before a French court (Bobigny Commercial Court).

The Danish buyer, after receiving and using the goods, informed the Austrian seller about the non conformity of the goods.

The seller made the sale conditional to the acceptance of the buyer by the defendant's credit insurance, which did not occur.

The buyer insisted by resubmitting by fax an offer to the seller, requesting the delivery of the meat in six days.

Germany, Court of Appeal of Cologne, Danish buyer v. German seller, 16 December 1992, (Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XXI (1996), p. 535).

The seller brought an action against the buyer before a French court, demanding payment of the full price and interest accruing.

The plaintiff, an Italian wine seller, sued the German buyer (defendant) for payment of the price of wine sold and delivered.

However, the seller could not prove that the basic agreement nor the general conditions had been made known to the buyer.

6. benefits obtained by the seller from the buyer directly or indirectly from the resale, disposal., or use of goods after importation.

Moreover, the buyer claimed that the seller, in the course of their dealings, had not objected to claims for damages filed untimely.

The buyer, a company established under Italian law, placed an order for connectors with a French company, the seller, in February 1990.

Under the new system the State Housing Agency issues Government backed bonds and acts as a broker between the buyer and seller.

The seller sold computer microprocessors to the buyer, who paid the price and resold the goods in the original package without examining them.

However, the court held that the buyer did not violate such an obligation since the seller failed to provide the necessary details and the buyer was under no obligation to obtain a blank letter of credit.

The time has come, the day draws near don't let the buyer rejoice, nor the seller mourn for wrath is on all its multitude.

The time has come, the day draws near don't let the buyer rejoice, nor the seller mourn for wrath is on all its multitude.

An Austrian buyer ordered from the German seller a cooling device according to custom specifications for its special intended use in a water plant.

The time is come, the day draweth near let not the buyer rejoice, nor the seller mourn for wrath is upon all the multitude thereof.

The time is come, the day draweth near let not the buyer rejoice, nor the seller mourn for wrath is upon all the multitude thereof.

The buyer, a British Columbia based producer of styrofoam blocks, purchased over Canadian  800,000 of equipment manufactured by the Austrian subsidiary of the German seller.

Finally, though the requirements of the notice should not be too burdensome for the buyer, they should allow for an adequate redress action by the seller.

The plaintiff, a German buyer, and the defendant, an Austrian seller, entered into an agreement for the FOB delivery of a certain quantity of propane gas.

The buyer, however, did not obtain a letter of credit since an essential element was missing, i.e. the seller failed to name the port of origin.

4. there is no special relationship between the seller and buyer, or the existing special relationship between the two parties exercises no influence on the transaction price

When asked to return the advance payment to the Swiss buyer, the seller kept it to offset the damages arising from the sale at a reduced price.

A French seller, a jeans manufacturer, concluded a contract for the sale of a given quantity of goods with a buyer based in the United States of America.

The purpose of such an instruction would be to enable the shipper seller to check that payment has been received before the cargo is delivered to the consignee buyer.

The Court found that the seller had complied with his duty to give proper notice to the buyer of its intention to sell the goods by fax and telephone.

By telex of 13 April, the French buyer changed his order once again, a change which the German seller stated that it could not accept for short term deliveries.

Further, the Supreme Court stated that if the seller fails to repair the non conforming goods within reasonable time, the buyer may do so and claim compensation from the seller for the related expenses, which amount to damages within the meaning of article 45 (1) (b) CISG.

The Court also found that the fourteen days term indicated by the seller to the buyer to take possession of the goods was reasonable within the meaning of article 88 CISG.

In the first instance, the Regional Court of Grenoble, without invoking CISG, ordered the buyer to pay the full price, but found that the seller was not entitled to claim interest.

The plaintiff, a French buyer, had ordered on 22 March 1990 several batches of electronic components from the defendant, a German seller, through the defendant apos s liaison office in France.

An example of this concerns Incoterms that do not correctly reflect the intentions of the buyer and seller in terms of the sharing of costs and responsibilities in delivering the goods.

In addition, since the buyer had argued that the seller had delivered surplus goods, the Court of Appeal held that if the quantity of goods delivered did not correspond to the quantity specified in the order, it was the responsibility of the buyer to return the surplus goods immediately.

(iii) A buyer under a sale of goods outside the ordinary course of the seller's business where the seller remains in possession of the goods for more than thirty sixty ninety days