Concerning the issue of duplicate claims, the secretariat indicated that it was aware of the risk of duplicate claims from the outset of claims processing and took steps to identify and eliminate such claims during the course of claims processing.

It was suggested that paragraph (2), which placed foreign claims on equal footing with local non priority claims, should be redrafted so as to make it clear that foreign claims would not receive better treatment than those local claims whose payment was deferred.

It also found that Cameroon s claims were admissible.

I can understand the extravagant claims for it.

It also includes the Panel's recommendations on the merits of xxxx 4,24 category C claims (the fourth instalment claims ).

Second instalment category A claims corrections Third instalment category A claims corrections Fourth instalment category A claims corrections Fifth instalment category A claims corrections Sixth instalment category A claims corrections First instalment category C claims corrections Fourth instalment category C claims corrections

The UNCC secretariat commented that it has also assisted the D2 Panel of Commissioners in its review of the category D Palestinian late claims, a claims population with a significant risk of overstated claims.

It was therefore not possible for the Commission to detect multiple family claims submitted by individual members of the same family (family claims attracted a higher rate of compensation than claims submitted by individuals).

Duplicate claims are two or more claims filed by an individual in the same claims category.

The fourthsecond group of overlapping claims initially consisted of E4 claims related to 39seven category C claims and 24 category C and D claims.

Claims

claims

Claims

Soon after the Panel commenced its review of the eligible category D Palestinian late claims , it became apparent that this claims population exhibits certain features that were not present in the claims in the regular category D claims programme or, if present, were not present to the same degree.

The average number of loss types is 3.14 for the claims in this instalment, compared with 2.01 for all claims in the regular category D claims programme, 1.93 for Jordanian claims and 1.71 for Kuwaiti claims.

duplicate claims Two or more claims filed by a claimant under the late claims programme in the same category.

It is not possible for me to assess the veracity of these claims.

Thus, it finds these claims inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

It is recommended that no compensation be awarded for the two duplicate claims.

My wife claims it was I who drew the gun to shoot her.

Duplicate claims

Reclamation claims

Withdrawn claims

Claims received

Although paragraph (4) of the commentary discussed the possibility of joint claims, some viewed it as failing to offer direction in respect of separate or successive claims.

It was further observed that draft subparagraph 83 (b)(ii) applied only to claims against the carrier, while claims brought by the carrier were outside its scope.

Claims and adjustments Fewer claims received. Official hospitality Actual expenditures incurred.

In the third instalment of category A claims, four claims were found to be duplicates of claims previously awarded compensation.

In the fifth instalment of category A claims, four claims were found to be duplicates of claims previously awarded compensation.

matching claims Two or more claims filed by a claimant during the regular filing period and under the late claims programme.

Before discussing the Panel's specific recommendations for compensating the thirtieth instalment claims, it is important to restate the Panel's approach to the verification and valuation of these claims.

(c) Deliberately destroys a card or claims in bad faith that it is lost

In addition, it was making territorial claims to sacred land belonging to its neighbours.

5. It is quite difficult to ascertain the exact amount of claims under arbitration.

review of non overlapping claims in the FOURTHsecond group of overlapping claims

These E4 claims were considered in the second instalment of E4 claims.

16. Outliers are those claims that do not resemble similarly situated claims.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

The average amount claimed for the claims in this instalment is about USD 2 million, compared to about USD 820,000 for all claims, about USD 934,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 861,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme.

It was thus suggested that article 10 should provide that claims of foreign creditors had at least to be treated in the same manner as local non priority claims.

The Office acted for the Organization in the settlement of claims brought either by the United Nations or against it, in particular commercial claims arising out of peacekeeping activities.

The Panel found that the remainder of the potential claims, including all of the claims in respect of Bahraini detainees, did not meet the criteria for filing set out in decision 12 and, consequently, it did not accept these claims for filing.

It should be noted that, in respect of 24 claims, the excess amounts previously awarded in respect of the category A claims have been deducted from the amount of compensation recommended by the Panel for the successful matching category C Palestinian late claims.

In respect of paragraph (2), it was pointed out that in some legal systems the payment of certain categories of claims (such as fines and other pecuniary sanctions, or claims whose payment was deferred) were ranked lower than unsecured non priority claims.

Admissibility of claims