He cannot be questioned about what He does, but they will be questioned.

He is not questioned whatever He does, whereas they will all be questioned.

He shall not be questioned as to what He does, but they shall he questioned.

He shall be questioned not as to that which He doth, while they shall be questioned.

He cannot be questioned as to what He does, while they will be questioned.

He will not be questioned about what He does, but they will be questioned.

None shall question Him about what He does, but they shall be questioned.

He will not be questioned as to that which He doeth, but they will be questioned.

He is not questioned concerning what He does, but they are questioned.

He is not to be questioned about what He does, but they shall be questioned.

He is not questioned about what He does, but they will be questioned.

He will not be questioned about anything He does, but all people will be questioned about their deeds.

He cannot be questioned concerning what He does and they shall be questioned.

None shall question Him about His works, but they shall be questioned.

He cannot be questioned for His acts, but they will be questioned (for theirs).

Questioning, interrogation and arrest

Only Mr. Privert was questioned by the judge.

Trial activities during 2004 2005

Substantive issues Unfair asylum hearing

It was the interrogation hold. The CIA was there.

The next hearing is scheduled for 21 April 2004.

Ms. Bakhmina was interrogated for three days in succession.

The groundwork for the provision of information about trials has also been established.

According to him, his son should have been tried by a jury, not a single judge.

F. were still ongoing.

Once van Meegeren was on trial, he couldn't stop talking.

Only a court of law may try and convict a person for a criminal offence.

8.3 By a further letter of 4 May 2004, counsel provided a statement of the same day by Human Rights Watch entitled Suspected militant's unfair trial and torture claims implicate Sweden , in which the complainant's retrial as well as the State party's monitoring arrangements were criticized.

The court examined the evidence and affirmed the conviction

His American interrogators described him as an amicable psychopath.

She was held in isolation for four weeks, interrogated day and night, and beaten.

During the course of her interrogation, threats were made against Ms. Bakhmina and her family.

She was conducted to the offices of the Ministry of Internal Affairs where, in the office of one Mr. Florensky, she was interrogated by four men.

That Judge would hear the case from start to finish and would be able to step in for the two original Judges who were no longer able to sit.

Referring to domestic law in this regard, it points out that, while the Regional Court hearings were held in chambers, i.e., were not open to the public, the Appeal Court hearings were held in public.

The text will be considered at the meeting of the national correspondents (see above, para.

According to counsel, these statements were presented to the complainant by Egyptian officials during an interrogation.

In total, there are 22 Accused awaiting trial and 2 awaiting judgement that are on Provisional Release.

He also claims that the first opportunity he had to engage a private lawyer was at the inquest.

The pre trial chambers have held hearings and issued decisions on a number of issues, including the arrest warrants.

She was also told that in order to be released she would have to provide the information requested by her interrogators.

In his view, in order to have undertaken an adequate review, the Supreme Court should hear the victim to test the veracity of her testimony.

It applies to criminal and civil tribunals and incorporates a number of principles such as the right to legal counsel the right to equality of arms the right to a public hearing the right to appeal and the right to be tried without undue delay.

In order to accommodate Timorese judges undergoing mandatory training, the Special Panels for serious crimes began operating two panels in split sessions and expanded the hours for hearing cases.

The provision could also contain details of the method of selecting the judges or judges ad hoc who would sit in the chamber.