The source, to which those comments were transmitted, made observations on them.

The source, to which those comments were transmitted, made observations on them.

He's supposed to be submitting evidence to a jury.

2.2 Proceedings against the author were conducted by a judge who was allegedly biased against him.

The Working Group transmitted the replies provided by the Government to the source, which offered comments on them.

The first step was the electronic matching of claims and the manual verification of matches in order to identify those claims filed under the late claims programme by claimants who previously filed claims during the regular filing period.

The author has not rebutted this assertion, which she herself passed on.

The author again ignored the summons.

The State party apos s information on admissibility and the author apos s comments thereon

Appeals from the Summary Court are heard by the Grand Court and appeals against Grand Court decisions go before the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal.

Moreover, whereas the defendant was not able to cross question her ophthalmologist, the author had the opportunity to cross question the expert proposed by the defendant.

The complainants' comments on the State party's submission

Author's comments on the State party's submission

Authors' comments on the State party's submissions

Comments of the author on the State party's observations

The author's comments on the State party's submission

The source made comments on the reply of the Government.

In case of doubt as to the wish of the author, the Committee shall be seized of the communication.

The Solicitor General commented on the appeal on 21 January 2000, further to which the author replied on 25 May 2000. This was the last submission of the author to the Supreme Court.

The author was indicted by the First Chamber of the Provincial Court of Malaga (Sección Primera de la Audicencia Provincial de Malaga).

2.7 The author appealed the decision of 1 September 1989.

The Working Group transmitted the reply provided by the Government to the source, which made comments on it.

Accordingly, Mr. Bohsali filed for fraud against the author.

The present report is submitted in response to that request.

The authors' comments on admissibility and merits

The authors' comments on the State party's submissions

According to the source, the Chinese Government's response does not contest any of the facts set forth in its initial petition it insists that Mr. Zhang was

It expresses to the Belgian Government its satisfaction regarding the quality of the report, although it regrets that it was not submitted within the time limit.

2.1 On 16 August 1991, Ms. Gascon, the author's then wife, lodged a complaint against the author for allegedly making death threats against her.

However, the author has not substantiated his claim that the court acted arbitrarily or that it discriminated against him.

The Board also requested the Director General to submit to the Conference revisions to the original proposal.

Reservations have also been voiced concerning the competence and independence of the interpreters.

With regard to the State party's argument that the author should also direct the communication against Switzerland, the Committee notes that the author does not contest the part of his pension that he receives from the Swiss social security system and that, furthermore, Switzerland has not ratified the Optional Protocol. The fact that the communication is directed only against Spain does not constitute an obstacle to its admissibility.

In the case of the author, the State party maintains that while the case was being investigated (3 years and 11 days), the author did not make any request for specific relief.

2.8 As to the exhaustion of domestic remedies in respect of the physical abuse to which the author was allegedly subjected, it is stated that a lawyer filed a complaint against the police officers on the author apos s behalf.

RESOLUTION 288 5 VIII 2002 MsZ

The author's comments on the State party's submissions

Comments by the author on the State party's submissions

The authors' comments on the State party's submissions

The author was heard in the presence of the two judges.

Authors' comments on the State party's observations

The State party apos s observations and the author apos s comments thereon

Comments on the working paper submitted by Colombia entitled Some

B. Responding to the problem of significantly overdue reports

The judgement handed down by these judges was silent on all the evidence presented by the author to prove his innocence.