Her appeal was ultimately dismissed as having been filed outside the statutory deadline.

And the court dismisses the case before it

Objection overruled.

Application rejected

The Court dismissed the appeal.

The report should include information on

The application was refused.

The Court rejected the application.

They said, No.

His plan was discarded.

This application was also denied.

The claim was dismissed.

A second letter, dated 18 October 1988, informed him that his appeal was dismissed.

The Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal.

The allegation was therefore dismissed.

All those complaints were rejected.

All these requests were denied.

The lawyers' request was, however, rejected.

These bills were rejected by the Senate

The Commission rejected these applications.

The Government reported that the case had been transmitted to the Ministry of Defence, which had decided to dismiss it.

In May 2001, the migration agent advised that the class action had been refused, but that another class action had been commenced.

The lower court rejected the application.

The Supreme Court dismissed his allegations.

The Supreme Court dismissed that argument.

However, the court denied both requests.

And I'm not going to be overruled by anyone either.

Your request is denied, counselor.

As yours is now, by me.

The application was dismissed on 30 June 1998.

Altogether, 353 claims had been rejected, while the others had been sent to the National Foundation for Indigenous Affairs for further study.

On 12 October 1998, the court dismissed the complaint.

Mr Muller's application was dismissed by the High Court.

An appeal was rejected by the Stuttgart Public Prosecutor General.

The Supreme Court, however, rejected that argument.

We'll break the alibi.

The Government further informed the Special Rapporteur that the death sentence on Rahman Radjabi had been confirmed by the Supreme Court and his appeal had not been accepted.

This request was rejected on 6 August 2004.

6.4 The Committee observes that, with the dismissal by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in October 1992 of the author apos s petition for special leave to appeal, the author has exhausted domestic remedies for purposes of the Optional Protocol.

On 19 November 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the author's application and on 24 December 1999, rejected his appeal from the Court of Appeal.

The decision requires no substantiation and the cadi may either accept it or reject it and appoint two other arbiters as a final resort.

This new application was rejected on 15 October 2002.

On 19 February 1999, the Federal Court dismissed the appeal.

Now I have a little note here which I consider puts that possibility quite out of court.

My objection then was overruled by Mr Justice Swindon.