Which law should govern?

Under one view, questions of priority should be governed by the law governing the receivable to which the assignment relates .

It shall remain the rule that national courts normally have jurisdiction.

The military and arbitral jurisdictions are recognized as independent jurisdictions

It was noted that according to that provision, once the initial assignment of a receivable was covered, any subsequent assignment of that receivable would also be covered (the principle of perpetuatio juris).

The court apos s jurisdiction should not be retroactive it was in fact impossible to conceive how the court could have retroactive jurisdiction.

Indeed, not only should the consent of States be a precondition for the exercise of the court s jurisdiction but only concerned States should initiate its jurisdiction.

The discussion next focused on whether priority among several assignees of the same receivables from the same assignor should be governed by the law determined in accordance with paragraph (1) of article 28 quot , i.e., by the law governing the receivable to which the assignment relates or by the law of the country in which the assignor has its place of business .

Jurisdiction

The jurisdiction of the court should therefore be limited to the core crimes and even then the court should exercise jurisdiction only if the State concerned decided that it was unable to do so.

As the vast majority of delegations had stated, its jurisdiction should be complementary it should therefore act only when a national jurisdiction was non existent or not functioning.

Administrative boundary

Should the draft instrument allow for exclusive jurisdiction clauses?

It was also suggested that attention should be focused on matters relating to extraterritorial jurisdiction.

It was stated that often the application of the law governing the security right might be more appropriate (e.g., in case of property security rights which should be governed by the lex rei sitae).

Should exclusive jurisdiction clauses be enforceable against third parties?

Where there is a bilateral extradition treaty, that treaty should govern the relationship.

shall constitute that firearms offence under the law of the United Kingdom.

With regard to jurisdiction and the trigger mechanism, the court should have inherent jurisdiction regarding the crime of genocide and regarding cases referred to it by the Security Council.

It was also suggested that cross border insolvencies of insurance companies gave rise to special regulatory concerns and that therefore those insolvencies too should not be governed by the Model Provisions.

Further consideration should be given to the issue of whether exclusive jurisdiction clauses should be allowed pursuant to the draft instrument, and whether they should apply with respect to third parties

jurisdiction of States.

Jurisdiction

Protection from the jurisdiction of the Court should not be viewed as unusual.

Some villages are directly linked with the governorate seat and not with the subdistrict seat or district seat, in which case they are known as villages of the governorate seat

Unless otherwise agreed between the States concerned, a State cannot invoke immunity from jurisdiction before a court of another State which is otherwise competent in a proceeding which relates to

Each State Party shall adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction, in accordance with article 9 of the Convention, over the offences that it has established pursuant to this Protocol.

Jurisdiction Chapter 15

Jurisdiction and Arbitration

C. Jurisprudence

C. Military jurisdiction

Article VI (Jurisdiction)

That's county territory.

Others, however, were not, even though they were in treaty form, and should therefore be studied. 61. Some comparison with the law of treaties was essential.

However, the two phases should be subject to space law rather than air law.

1. This Convention does not prevail over any international agreement that has already been or may be entered into and that specifically governs a transaction otherwise governed by this Convention.

Unless otherwise agreed between the States concerned, a State cannot invoke immunity from jurisdiction before a court of another State which is otherwise competent in a proceeding which relates to the determination of

To avoid unnecessary jurisdictional conflicts, a clear provision should be formulated, and accepted by all, defining the respective jurisdiction of national courts and the international criminal court.

One view was expressed that this should be the law governing the place of the document, while another view suggested that the proper applicable law would be the one governing the procedures in draft article 6.

The exclusive jurisdiction clause should contain the name and location of the chosen court

For the application of the Penal Code, the following shall fall under Syrian jurisdiction

However, the principle of complementarity should not result in imposing unnecessary limits on the court apos s jurisdiction.

Ordinary law courts, with customary assessors, shall have jurisdiction over disputes.

The ratione temporis and ratione materiae competences, as well as the investigating powers of the two commissions, were identical.

States should adopt extradition arrangements to ensure that offenders are prosecuted in the most appropriate jurisdiction and to prevent them escaping justice by moving jurisdiction.