They have an increased risk of infection, an increased risk of malignancy.

It is.

The embargo has therefore aggravated the already precarious situation in the country.

1. Risk that the situation will worsen

What check up?

So attractively sinister! Taurus, the bull, you know.

That doesn't sound particularly menacing.

This can all seem very sinister.

You make it sound very menacing.

In fact, the infectious agent of disease in this cancer is something altogether more sinister, and something that we hadn't really thought of before.

Malicious acts insurance and resource management

This is the big, bad world full of mean people, where nasty things happen.

No doubt, there would have been much less good and much more evil.

Don't stop to count it now. We haven't got time. Do you realize this means we'll have something to eat?

It's dirty, often degrading, sometimes dangerous.

Makes what worse?

Less safe!

And this is even more dangerous well, it's dangerous again.

These widespread attitudes illustrate country folk apos s dislike of taking risks.

Only God is good.

For someone like this Okichi, who's so pure, and pretty, and free of any stain,

They can even be more dangerous.

The steps taken to obtain a more complete understanding of the overall coverage of United Nations staff under the malicious acts insurance policy were described in section II of the report.

Bigcity people are more cynical... They're more sinful, too.

But it seems to be that the USA's sins, compared to those of many previous empires, are of a more moderate, if more pervasive, kind.

Deong, I don't approve of dictators any more than you do!

But in contrast to my evil twin who lusts after world domination, my motives are not sinister.

All the better. It's more dangerous. And the lock's too old.

And a small part of my brain is thinking, 'That is so gross and really dangerous,' but most of my brain is thinking, 'Please let there be some smack left by the time it gets to me.

If Europe wants to revive its economy and escape stagnation, it needs entrepreneurs to take more risk to innovate. But its financial system is undergoing a transition from a bank based to a market based system that involves risk aversion.

The victims are not even aware of the sinister danger until they are victimized.

Whoever does good will receive better than what he has done and whoever does ill shall be requited but to the extent of what he does.

Whoever brings virtue, for him is better than it and whoever brings evil so those who commit evil will not be repaid except to the extent of their deeds.

Whoso brings a good deed shall have better than it and whoso brings an evil deed those who have done evil deeds shall only be recompensed for that they were doing.

Whosoever bringeth good shall have better than it, and whosoever bringeth evil, then those who do ill works shall be rewarded only for that which they have been working.

Whosoever brings good (Islamic Monotheism along with righteous deeds), he shall have the better thereof, and whosoever brings evil (polytheism along with evil deeds) then, those who do evil deeds will only be requited for what they used to do.

Whoever brings a virtue will receive better than it. But whoever brings evil the evildoers will be rewarded only according to what they used to do.

He who shall bring a good deed shall be rewarded with what is better. But those who bring evil deeds shall not be requited more than their deeds.

Whoso bringeth a good deed, he will have better than the same while as for him who bringeth an ill deed, those who do ill deeds will be requited only what they did.

Whoever brings virtue shall receive a reward better than it, but whoever brings vice those who commit misdeeds shall not be requited except for what they used to do.

Whosoever does a good deed shall have better than it. But whosoever does evil deeds, they shall be recompensed for what they were doing.

Whoever comes on the Day of Judgement with a good deed will have better than it and whoever comes with an evil deed then those who did evil deeds will not be recompensed except as much as what they used to do.

The reward for a good deed will be greater than the deed itself and the recompense for an evil deed will be equivalent to the deed.

Whoever brings good, he shall have better than it, and whoever brings evil, those who do evil shall not be rewarded (for) aught except what they did.

He who does good shall be rewarded with something better. But he who does evil shall be requited according to his deeds.