Rules 6 and 7 of the rules of procedure (annex I) define observers in the following categories.

The deprivation of liberty of U Tin Oo is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 9, 10, 19, 20 and 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and falls within categories II and III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

These cases do not seem to fall squarely into any of the three categories covered by articles 16 to 18 on State responsibility.

The detention of Matrouk Al Faleh, Abdellah Al Hamed and Ali Al Damini is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 19, 20 and 21 (1) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and falls within category II of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.

The detention of Mr. Mazen Salah ben Mohamed Al Husayn Al Tamimi is in contravention of article 9, 19 and 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and falls within categories I and II of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

The detention of Mr. Majeed Hamdane b. Rashed Al Qaid is in contravention of articles 9 and 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and falls within categories I and II of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

Article 6 was adopted (see annex I, article 9).

Article 7 was adopted (see annex I, article 10).

Article 9 was adopted (see annex I, article 11).

Article 10 was adopted (see annex I, article 13).

The detention of Mr. Khalid Ahmed Al Eleq is in contravention of article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and falls within category I of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

Articles 16 (2), 47 (9), 75 (2), 76 (9), 84 (2), 287 (8), 298 (6), 312, 313 (1), 319 (1) and 319 (2) articles 2 (2), 2 (5) and 6 (3) of annex II articles 2 and 3 (e) of annex V article 4 (4) of annex VI article 2 (1) of annex VII and article 3 (e) of annex VIII

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Zhao Yan is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 9, 10 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and falls within categories II and III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

This paper provides information on the second of these, particularly the financial conditions of multilateral institutions, although many similar conditions affect private sector lending.

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Muhannad Qutaysh, Mr. Haytham Qutaysh and Mr. Mas'oud Hamid is arbitrary, as being in contravention of articles 19 and 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and articles 18 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and falls within categories I and III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

Article 20 and additional article 21, were adopted (see annex I, articles 21 and 22).

The detention of Mahna Abdul Aziz Al Habil is in contravention of articles 10 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and falls within categories II and III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

Documents in the latter category would benefit from draft article 9, paragraph 4.

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Zhang Yinan is arbitrary, as being in contravention of articles 9, 19 and 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and falls within categories II and III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

Recalling section II.A of its resolution 52 216, in which it reaffirmed that the Flemming principle should continue to serve as the basis for determining the conditions of service of the General Service and related categories and endorsed the revised methodology for surveys of best prevailing conditions of employment for these categories,

Paragraph 3 of article 19 bis, was adopted (see annex I, article 20).

The first category, in accordance with rule 11 bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ICTY, includes confirmed accusations, and the second category comprises cases in various stages of investigation.

They specify the terms and conditions of the protection of the most sensitive transports (categories I and II) by an escort.

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Gurbandury Durdykuliyev is arbitrary, as being in contravention of articles 9 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and falls within categories II and III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

Recalling section II.A of its resolution 52 216, in which it reaffirmed that the Flemming principle should continue to serve as the basis for determining the conditions of service of the General Service and related categories and endorsed the revised methodology for surveys of best prevailing conditions of employment for those categories,

Persons in the first category are liable to the death penalty (art. 14).

Cases of detention declared arbitrary

Article 19, as amended, was adopted (see annex I, article 19).

See article 35(1) and 35(2) of the Rules and chapter II of the First C Report.

Articles 16, 24 and 29 and articles 12, 13 and 14 dealt with similar rights and should therefore be grouped together.

The deprivation of liberty of Ms. Qiu Minghua is arbitrary, being in contravention of article 9 and article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and falls under categories II and III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Jamal Abdul Rahim is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 9 and 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and falls within category I of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

(b) The detention of Firas Yunis is declared to be arbitrary being in contravention of articles 9, 10, 11, 19 and 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and articles 9, 14, 19 and 22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which the Syrian Arab Republic is a party and falling within categories II and III of the principles applicable in the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

Conditions of service of the General Service and other locally recruited categories

Background Article 3, paragraph 9, of the Kyoto Protocol provides that commitments for subsequent periods for Parties included in Annex I shall be established in amendments to Annex B to this Protocol, which shall be adopted in accordance with the provisions of Article 21, paragraph 7 .

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Abdenacer Younes Meftah Al Rabassi is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 14 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and falls under categories II and III of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.

ILO Convention 172 concerning Working Conditions in Hotels, Restaurants and Similar Establishments calls for policies to ensure improvements.

The United Nations Sales Convention contained a provision similar to paragraph 2 of draft article 6.

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Alfonso Martín del Campo Dodd is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 5, 9 and 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and falls within category III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

The deprivation of liberty of Mohamed Ramadan Mohamed Hussein El Derini is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 9 and 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and articles 9 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Egypt is a party, and falls within category I of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

At the same meeting, paragraph 1 of article 16 was adopted (see annex I, article 15).

In both the first and second categories, the police invariably claim that the victims were armed robbery suspects.

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Muhammad Umar Salim Krain is arbitrary, as being in contravention of article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and falls within category I of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.

Annex (Article 2, paragraph 1, and article 4, paragraph 1)

falling within categories II and III