However, the latter task would appear to be far more daunting than the former.

Payment by the former was reportedly 300 per ex combatant, whereas the latter were offering 1,000.

The call for criminalization should be vis à vis the former rather than the latter.

And that's that's rather more challenging than all the speakers before me and all the ones coming after me.

Many apostles have been scoffed before you but they who scoffed were themselves caught by what they had ridiculed.

Many apostles have been scoffed before you but they who scoffed were themselves caught by what they had ridiculed.

And indeed the Noble Messengers before you were mocked at, but their mockery ruined the mockers themselves.

And indeed the Noble Messengers before you were mocked at, but their mockery ruined the mockers themselves.

Messengers indeed were mocked at before thee, but those that scoffed at them were encompassed by that they mocked at.

Messengers indeed were mocked at before thee, but those that scoffed at them were encompassed by that they mocked at.

And assuredly mocked were the apostles before thee, then there surrounded those of them Who scoffed that whereat they had been mocking!

And assuredly mocked were the apostles before thee, then there surrounded those of them Who scoffed that whereat they had been mocking!

Indeed (many) Messengers were mocked before you (O Muhammad SAW), but the scoffers were surrounded by that, whereat they used to mock.

Indeed (many) Messengers were mocked before you (O Muhammad SAW), but the scoffers were surrounded by that, whereat they used to mock.

Messengers before you were also ridiculed, but those who jeered were surrounded by what they had ridiculed.

Messengers before you were also ridiculed, but those who jeered were surrounded by what they had ridiculed.

Other Messengers before you were also mocked, but those who scoffed at the Messengers were overtaken by the same scourge that they had scoffed at.

Other Messengers before you were also mocked, but those who scoffed at the Messengers were overtaken by the same scourge that they had scoffed at.

Messengers before thee, indeed, were mocked, but that whereat they mocked surrounded those who scoffed at them.

Messengers before thee, indeed, were mocked, but that whereat they mocked surrounded those who scoffed at them.

Apostles were certainly derided before you but those who ridiculed them were besieged by what they had been deriding.

Apostles were certainly derided before you but those who ridiculed them were besieged by what they had been deriding.

Before you, other Messengers were mocked, but the mockers were encompassed by the very thing they mocked.

Before you, other Messengers were mocked, but the mockers were encompassed by the very thing they mocked.

And already were messengers ridiculed before you, but those who mocked them were enveloped by what they used to ridicule.

And already were messengers ridiculed before you, but those who mocked them were enveloped by what they used to ridicule.

They mocked the Messengers who were sent before you thus, the torment which they had ridiculed encompassed them all.

They mocked the Messengers who were sent before you thus, the torment which they had ridiculed encompassed them all.

And certainly apostles before you were scoffed at, then there befell those of them who scoffed that at which they had scoffed.

And certainly apostles before you were scoffed at, then there befell those of them who scoffed that at which they had scoffed.

Other messengers have been mocked before you, but those who scoffed were overwhelmed by the very thing they had mocked.

Other messengers have been mocked before you, but those who scoffed were overwhelmed by the very thing they had mocked.

Mocked were (many) messenger before thee But their scoffers were hemmed in by the thing that they mocked.

Mocked were (many) messenger before thee But their scoffers were hemmed in by the thing that they mocked.

The former implies that they can be sent back to their country of origin, while the latter are protected by the principle of non refoulement.

The immediate danger, however, stemmed from a possible overreaction by policy makers.

The court distinguished between a bribe, which it defined as intrinsically immoral for both the offeror and the receiver, and a ransom, which involves immorality only on the part of the blackmailer.

Those who refused to go to the camps might be treated as hostile by the military, while those who agreed to go to the camps risked being considered collaborators by the rebels.

The former are those that come into existence and act according to predetermined rules (including customary international law).

Current maintainer, author

Former author and maintainer

Author and former maintainer

Author and former maintainer

One of these was in the pre trial stage, Nineteen persons detained in Guasdualito see above, para. 29.

A State that is unwilling to authorize a sub State actor to pursue independent treaty making may, however, be willing to conclude a treaty on its behalf.