In Mauritius, the latter proposition has been proven correct.

3.12 The Ombudsman may be consulted on policy issues where his or her views and experience may prove useful.

Do you agree with Dr. Satomi?

The reasons cited in the opinion to demonstrate the unique character of nuclear weapons are as follows

It is just now 3.

I see a bull.

The Administration also notes that the Board has attested to the fairness of the financial statements in its audit opinion.

I'll be happy to prove it.

If that is what you wish me to do.

The contractual and trade approach, and as a matter of fact, the documentary approach (charter parties) in paragraph 1, has clear support in the comments received, but some reservations have been expressed and views on details vary.

Dr. Satomi, do you agree with that?

The Party concerned may present expert testimony or opinion at the hearing.

The protection of political opinions only applies to opinions which are either expressed or demonstrated, and does not apply if violent methods are used to express or demonstrate these opinions ...

Expressed specific reservations

Please tell us what you think.

A witness is required to testify on facts of which he has cognizance and not on opinions.

In advice dated 28 January 2003 provided by Mr. Hammarberg to counsel, the former considered that there was prima facie evidence of torture.

As one speaker put it, this required significant resources, but had proven to be a great investment.

Why did they not bring four witnesses (in support of their charge)? And since they did not bring the four witnesses they are themselves liars in the sight of God.

Why did they not bring four witnesses upon it? Since they did not bring witnesses, they themselves are liars before Allah.

Why did they not bring four witnesses against it? But since they did not bring the witnesses, in God's sight they are the liars.

Wherefore did they not bring four witnesses thereof? Then when they brought not the witnesses, those! with Allah they are the liars.

Why did they not produce four witnesses? Since they (the slanderers) have not produced witnesses! Then with Allah they are the liars.

Why did they not bring four witnesses to testify to it? If they fail to bring the witnesses, then in God s sight, they are liars.

Why did the slanderers not bring four witnesses (to prove their charge)? Now that they have not brought witnesses, they themselves are liars in the sight of Allah.

Why did they not produce four witnesses? Since they produce not witnesses, they verily are liars in the sight of Allah.

Why did they not bring four witnesses to it? So when they could not bring the witnesses, they are liars in Allah s sight.

Why, did they not bring four witnesses against it? But since they did not bring the witnesses, before Allah they are the liars.

Why did they who slandered not produce for it four witnesses? And when they do not produce the witnesses, then it is they, in the sight of Allah, who are the liars.

Would that they had brought four witness to testify to their report. Since they brought none, they are liars before God.

Why did they not bring four witnesses of it? But as they have not brought witnesses they are liars before Allah.

Why did they not produce four witnesses? If they could not produce any witnesses, they were indeed liars in the sight of God!

Why did they not bring four witnesses to prove it? When they have not brought the witnesses, such men, in the sight of Allah, (stand forth) themselves as liars!

He presents his case, and we are his best witnesses.

UNHCR indicated that as of 2005 (i.e., for audit certificates covering 2004 expenditures), statistics on qualified and negative opinions would be centrally available.

UNHCR indicated that as of 2005 (i.e., for audit certificates covering 2004 expenditures), statistics on qualified and negative opinions would be centrally available.

The results of this morning's vote clearly confirm that the international community is divided on the text submitted to the Assembly.

Our observations are evidenced by the minutes on the mentioned sessions (CERD C SR.1260 and CERD C SR.1262).

The Embassy of the United States of America in Minsk did not agree with the opinion of the court that computers had been stolen, which also supports Mr. Marynich's innocence.

(b) Falsification of documents enabling a person to have care of a child, for example, consent papers of the biological parents, or certificates of the prospective adopters fitness to adopt

The opinion shall also state, as appropriate, whether

Our opinion is, clearly, no.

Then it's quite obvious you're against any action at all.

You need a 3H security clearance.

The Parties thanked the Guarantor Countries for their efforts, expressed satisfaction with that collaboration and made observations with regard to form and substance, clarifying their points of view.