And the court dismisses the case before it

The Court dismissed the appeal.

The Court rejected the application.

The Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal.

This appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court of Justice, which considered that the complainant had not properly addressed the matter to the Court for Administrative Affairs of First Instance.

All those complaints were rejected.

2.7 On 28 June 1999, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

The Prosecutor v.

The application was dismissed on 30 June 1998.

The Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal on 3 October 1988.

An appeal was rejected by the Stuttgart Public Prosecutor General.

It was after this refusal that the father filed his appeal.

His appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal of Jamaica on 7 December 1990.

His appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal of Jamaica on 16 May 1990.

On 23 February 1990, the Court of Appeal of Versailles dismissed his appeal.

On 19 November 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the author's application and on 24 December 1999, rejected his appeal from the Court of Appeal.

This new application was rejected on 15 October 2002.

On 19 February 1999, the Federal Court dismissed the appeal.

Appeals against this decision were dismissed by the Appeals Chamber on 24 September 2003.

The Court of Cassation rejected his further appeal on 9 April 1991.

4.7 On 3 June 2002 the Board rejected the appeal.

On 21 September 1990, the Constitutional Tribunal rejected his complaint.

The Court of Appeal of Jamaica dismissed their application for leave to appeal on 12 October 1987.

The Court of Appeal of Jamaica dismissed the author apos s appeal on 22 May 1987.

Her appeal was ultimately dismissed as having been filed outside the statutory deadline.

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court dismissed the authors' appeal.

The High Court dismissed the application on 25 September 1996.

On 19 June 1989, the Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal.

Decision dismissing the appeal on points of law brought against the decision of the Court of Appeal of Paris of 22 April 1992

Their appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal of Jamaica on 16 July 1990.

The Court held that Commercial Bank could sue Mrs Myburgh and her appeal was therefore dismissed.

The imposition of counsel was appealed and ultimately reversed in part by the Appeals Chamber.

His appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 4 February 1987, nearly three years later.

Their appeal was refused by the Court of Appeal of Jamaica on 16 July 1990.

The author subsequently filed a new application for reconsideration and it too was rejected.

On 5 October 1990, the Court of Appeal rejected the author apos s request for release.

Criminal and constitutional complaints up to the level of the Constitutional Court were unsuccessful.

4.4 Mr. Deolall has appealed his conviction, an appeal that was dismissed.

A further appeal to the Constitutional Court was rejected on 12 May 1998.

On 21 April 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the author's appeal.

In a judgement of 29 December 1999, the Fifth Chamber rejected the appeal.

On 31 May 2002, the Supreme Court dismissed his further appeal.

However, the appeal was rejected by the President of the District Court, on 17 February 1997.

The appeal against the stay was thus dismissed (article 8(1) MAL).

2.10 The Court of Cassation rejected these challenges in rulings handed down on 6 July 1999.