Forms of reparation

(g) Compensation awarded by the tribunals and alternatives

The results of this analysis showed that the proposed average and median recommended awards for claims in this instalment were lower than those for comparable claimants in the regular category D claims programme.

The statistical data shows that while the average and median claimed amounts for business losses are substantially higher than for claims in the regular category D claims programme, the average and median recommended awards are generally lower than awards in the regular category D claims programme.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

There were, however, many ways in which reparation could be made.

Freedom of contract approach vs. exemption from liability approach

The Panel reviewed the statistical data and noted that the average and median claimed amounts are generally lower than amounts claimed in the regular category D claims programme and the average proposed awards for these losses are also lower than the awards in the regular claims programme.

The Panel reviewed the statistical data and noted that the average and median claimed amounts are generally lower than amounts claimed in the regular category D claims programme and the average proposed awards for these losses are similar to the awards in the regular category D claims programme.

Reparation

Compensation

Revised awards for the twenty ninth instalment claims by UNCC claim number and claimant name 46

Reparation for injury

B. Compensatory payments

Limitation levels

Compensation for damage

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment stand alone claims by UNCC claim number and claimant name 23

Subject matter Equal treatment in relation to compensation for expropriation of property

Of these, the total amount awarded for 334 claims was increased by USD 2,523,268.24 and the total amount awarded for three claims was decreased by USD 42,543.06.

Secondary building compensation payments need to accelerate 12 beneficiaries have been paid (of the 116 who accepted compensation) all other payments are pending.

The Panel recommends no award of compensation for three claims.

Recommended awards for category C claims

The UNCC secretariat noted that neither claimants nor claimant Governments had the power to compel the Governing Council to set the methods of calculation and of payment of interest.

Decision concerning follow up programme for environmental claims awards (S AC.26 Dec.258 (2005)).

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment E2 claim by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 43

Revised awards for the twenty ninth instalment claims by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 47

It should be noted that, when notifying the Commission that these claims should have been awarded the lower amount, the Governments concerned returned to the Compensation Fund the excess amount previously awarded in respect of these claims.

As shown in table 2 below, the Panel recommends a total of USD 25,872,466.70.

The E4 Panel recommended compensation for loss of tangible property, but not for loss of stock, when it reviewed the claim.

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment stand alone claims by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 24

2. Unless otherwise freely agreed upon by the peoples concerned, compensation shall take the form of lands, territories and resources equal in quality, size and legal status or of monetary compensation or other appropriate redress.

Table 1. Recommended awards for category A claims

Table 2. Recommended awards for category C claims

Accordingly the Panel recommends that no compensation be awarded for this claim.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel's recommendation in respect of claim No. 5000394 is summarized in table 6.

Consequently, Jordan has failed to meet the evidentiary requirements for compensation as specified in article 35(3) of the Rules.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no compensation for this part of the first claim unit.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no compensation for this claim unit.

The Panel also finds that the primary restoration envisaged by the award in the fourth F4 instalment will not fully compensate for the loss resulting from this damage.

Accordingly, the Panel considers that compensatory restoration is appropriate in this case.

Kuwait seeks compensation for 35 deaths, which is their central estimate .

The amount sought consists of USD 3,499,993 for the costs of the studies and USD 556,209 for interest.

Iraq points out that the use of these indices is not the most reliable method for detecting changes in vegetation.

In the view of the Panel, while the use of HEA for this purpose is appropriate, some of Saudi Arabia's assumptions and inputs used regarding intensity of damage and recovery periods are inappropriate.