privy...

Count, Your Honor... it's a rare... privy...

b Privy Council Appeal No. 10 of 2 November 1993.

The author claims that, as a victim, she has not been privy to the court documents and, that, therefore, she cannot submit them to the Committee.

So, as Monty Python would have it, this is a bit Lord Privy Seal to say so, but this is children are not empty vessels.

He who is wounded in the stones, or has his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the assembly of Yahweh.

He who is wounded in the stones, or has his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the assembly of Yahweh.

He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council denied him special leave to appeal on 10 February 1993.

And it hasn't been published, so it's totally privy information just for TED.

Proceedings are currently adjourned pending hearings of legal arguments on preliminary issues and appeals to the Privy Council.

In certain cases an appeal could lie from those courts to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

a Privy Council Appeal No. 10 of 1993 judgement delivered on 2 November 1993.

c Judgement of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of 2 November 1993.

c Privy Council Appeal No. 10 of 1993 judgement delivered on 2 November 1993.

d Privy Council Appeal No. 10 of 1993 judgement delivered on 2 November 1993.

b Privy Council Appeal No. 10 of 1993 judgement delivered on 2 November 1993.

The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues had been privy to the same information during its four years of existence.

On 13 December 1990, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council dismissed their petition for special leave to appeal.

On 20 February 1991, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council dismissed his petition for special leave to appeal.

His petition for special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was dismissed on 26 May 1988.

His petition for special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was dismissed on 6 June 1991.

Their petition for special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was refused on 26 March 1992.

The Court of Appeal held that a court had a residual discretion to refuse a stay of proceedings only when a party clearly established that it was not privy to an arbitration agreement.

Further rights of appeal may be made to the Pitcairn Court of Appeal, comprising three judges, and the Privy Council.

In February 1991, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council dismissed the authors apos petition for special leave to appeal.

On 6 October 1992, his application for special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was equally dismissed.

A subsequent petition for special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was dismissed on 29 October 1992.

A London law firm represented him pro bono before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

And finally, a lot a people aren't privy to this, but the doodle is a precursor to some of our greatest cultural assets.

A further petition for special leave to appeal was dismissed by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on 4 October 1990.

A further petition for special leave to appeal was dismissed by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on 29 October 1992.

On 22 November 1993, the author apos s petition to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council for special leave to appeal was dismissed.

2.6 A London law firm represented the authors pro bono before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

He further argues that, since the author had available to him an appeal to the Court of Appeal and to the Privy Council, the Supreme Court would not have exercised its powers, pursuant to section 25, paragraph 2, of the Constitution.

The author apos s petition for special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was similarly dismissed, on 22 November 1993.

On 5 May 1992, the author apos s petition for special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was also dismissed.

The final right of appeal from a Grand Court decision is to the Privy Council in London, which does not deliver a decision, but advises the Secretary of State about the merits or otherwise of individual appeals.

Counsel states that although situated in London, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council is a Commonwealth Court and for that reason the relevant Commonwealth State should be held responsible for any irregularities in the conduct of the proceedings before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

He resubmits his complaint, which had earlier, on 26 July 1988, been declared inadmissible on the ground of non exhaustion of domestic remedies, since the author had not then sought leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

As stated before, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council dismissed the author apos s petition for special leave to appeal on 6 March 1989.

In December 1993, the author apos s death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment, following the Privy Council apos s judgement in Pratt and Morgan.

In this context, counsel notes that, at the hearing before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, their Lordships stated that they were not in a position to comment on the inefficiency of the judicial machinery in Jamaica.

Such determination should take into account the extent to which the presence of the UNMOs could be perceived to imply that any of former belligerents are not trusted or, worse, that the United Nations is privy to some information about the imminent outbreak of hostilities that it is not sharing.