(b) Withdraw its reservation

The State party is invited to withdraw its reservations.

It considered some of those reservations to be incompatible with the Convention's object and purpose and urged States parties to keep them under review, reduce their scope and establish timetables for withdrawing them.

An incompatible reservation would be null and void, irrespective of the reaction of other States parties.

Monitoring bodies could only bring the reservation made by the reserving State to the attention of the other States parties.

An objection to a reservation was an element (together with acts of acceptance of the reservation) of the process of giving the reservation its legal effects.

With regard to draft guideline 3.1.13, it would be preferable to keep the issues of reservations and dispute settlement separate or to treat the reservations in question like other reservations.

11. Expresses its concern at the great number of reservations to the Convention, and urges States parties to withdraw reservations incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and to consider reviewing other reservations with a view to withdrawing them

3. Calls upon those States that continue to maintain reservations to the 1925 Geneva Protocol to withdraw those reservations

The State party should consider withdrawing its reservations.

2. Expresses its concern about the great number of reservations to the Convention, and urges States parties to withdraw reservations incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and to consider reviewing other reservations with a view to withdrawing them

3. Expresses its concern about the great number of reservations to the Convention, and urges States parties to withdraw reservations that are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and to consider reviewing other reservations with a view to withdrawing them

Other delegations asked that the confidentiality clauses should be retained.

(c) Regularize its situation by replacing its impermissible reservation with a permissible reservation

2. Calls upon those States that continue to maintain reservations to the 1925 Geneva Protocol to withdraw those reservations

Under normal circumstances, only the reserving State itself was in a position to interpret and explain the nature of its reservation, the reasoning behind it and its compatibility with the treaty.

2. Calls upon those States that continue to maintain reservations to the 1925 Geneva Protocol to withdraw those reservations

4. Urges States parties to the Convention which have made reservations to review the compatibility of their reservations with article 51 of the Convention and other relevant rules of international law, with the aim of withdrawing them

Henceforth, both the naturalized person and his children can retain their family names.

3. Reiterates its concern at the great number of reservations to the Convention, and urges States parties to withdraw reservations that are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and to review on a regular basis any reservations with a view to withdrawing them

2. Reiterates its concern at the great number of reservations to the Convention, and urges States parties to withdraw reservations that are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and to review on a regular basis any reservations with a view to withdrawing them

It would be useful to study the different reservations made by various States parties, their formulation and the acceptance of and objections to such reservations by other States parties, especially with respect to their effects on individuals and other States.

15. Called upon, all States to ensure that no reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and encourages States parties to consider limiting the extent of any reservations they lodge to the Convention, to formulate any reservations as precisely and narrowly as possible and to review regularly any reservations made in respect of the provisions of the Convention, with a view to withdrawing them

So it can be assumed that the rest still stands.

a Declarations and reservations (excludes territorial declarations and certain other reservations and declarations of a political nature).

b Declarations and reservations (excludes territorial declarations and certain other reservations and declarations of a political nature).

g Declarations and reservations (excludes territorial declarations and certain other reservations and declarations of a political nature).

i Declarations and reservations (excludes territorial declarations and certain other reservations and declarations of a political nature).

n Declarations and reservations (excludes territorial declarations and certain other reservations and declarations of a political nature).

r Declarations and reservations (excludes territorial declarations and certain other reservations and declarations of a political nature).

(a) The reservation is prohibited by the treaty

The objecting State might also expect that its objection, by conveying disapproval, would open the way for what the Special Rapporteur had referred to as the reservations dialogue by encouraging the reserving State to reconsider the need for or the content of its reservation.

Furthermore, if a treaty permitted only certain reservations, it was clear that other reservations were prohibited and vice versa.

21. Urges States to limit the extent of any reservation they lodge to the Convention and to formulate any reservation as precisely and as narrowly as possible in order to ensure that no reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention, to review their reservations on a regular basis with a view to withdrawing them, and to withdraw reservations that are contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention

22. Urges States to limit the extent of any reservation they lodge to the Convention and to formulate any reservation as precisely and as narrowly as possible in order to ensure that no reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention, to review their reservations on a regular basis with a view to withdrawing them, and to withdraw reservations that are contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention

Try to keep the window above other windows

With regard to article 41, Australia would reserve its position.

48. Other delegations expressed reservations about the suggestion.

Except where a specific reservation is expressly authorized by a treaty, the other contracting parties are always free to reject it and even to enter into treaty relations with its author. A statement drafted as follows

Such an objection could put strong pressure on the reserving State to withdraw its reservation or to amend it to bring it into line with the object and purpose of the treaty.

Second, a State might consider that the reservation was incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty but preferred to present a simple objection in order to maintain the reserving State within the treaty with respect to itself.

With regard to the reservation made by Italy to article 6 of the Convention, members asked whether consideration was given to its withdrawal.

Its reservations were not indefinite and would disappear, once the problems giving rise to those reservations had been solved.

Horses and dogs were particularly prized since they radically increased hunting efficiency and range .

The report provided a comparison with reservations and declarations entered to the other United Nations human rights treaties and also outlined measures that had been taken in other contexts to address reservations, suggesting options available to the Committee to encourage the reduction and elimination reservations.