The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

Revised awards for the twenty ninth instalment claims by UNCC claim number and claimant name 46

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment stand alone claims by UNCC claim number and claimant name 23

Others stated that claimants contacted them through word of mouth.

For this purpose, the Austrian seller assigned to the plaintiff its purported damages claim against the defendant.

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment E2 claim by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 43

Revised awards for the twenty ninth instalment claims by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 47

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment stand alone claims by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 24

These entities are referred to herein as Claimants .

In this claim, which was submitted on a category E (corporate) claim form, the Claimant seeks compensation in the amount of US 951,630,871 for the costs allegedly incurred in

The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim provided additional evidence (motor vehicle deregistration certificates) and claimed for losses in addition to those losses claimed by the E4 claimant.

With respect to the remaining claim, the only evidence provided by the claimant to prove his authority to file a claim on behalf of the company was a business card describing the claimant as Executive Director Partner and a lease in the name of three individuals who the claimant described as the corporate shareholders.

Of the 19 claims, 18 were deferred for determinations in respect of stand alone, overlapping and competing business claim issues and for investigation of potential irregularities in the documentation provided by claimants in support of their asserted business losses.

Under the Rules, claimants are required to provide an affirmation as to the accuracy of the information contained in the claim and the losses being asserted.

The Governing Council designated category C claims as urgent claims to which expedited procedures should be applied.

After these transfers and additions, the claims remaining in the thirtieth instalment therefore relate to 25 claims for the losses of 24 companies and are hereinafter referred to as the claims in this instalment .

In its review of the Claims, the Panel found that all the Claims contained a statement of claim and evidence sufficient to establish at least parts of certain loss elements alleged within the Claims.

GE.96 64795 Introduction On 30 July 1993, KUWAIT OIL COMPANY (K.S.C.) ( KOC or the Claimant ) filed with the United Nations Compensation Commission (the UNCC or the Commission ) a claim referred to by the Claimant as the Well Blowout Control Claim (the WBC Claim ).

The E2 claim alleges company losses totalling USD 629,149.

In his category A claim, the claimant named his wife as a family member who departed Kuwait with him.

In the court proceedings, the Kuwaiti claimant is referred to as the licence holder only while the partners, including the Kuwaiti claimant's husband, are referred to as the users of the licence.

The Claimant alleges that even before it was forced to evacuate its embassy

The Claimant states that it does not attach relevant bills or inventory to its claim due to security reasons.

The fifth F4 instalment consists of 19 claims submitted by six governments (collectively the Claimants ) concerning damage caused by Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

For example, cross checks and electronic and manual matching have been conducted in order to identify duplicate or overlapping or competing claims as mentioned above.

Other losses Twelve of the claims in this instalment seek compensation for other losses for a total asserted value of KWD 409,306 (approximately USD 1,416,284).

In connection with the evacuation, the Claimant alleges that it paid for buses, catering services and chartered aircraft for its evacuees.

In addition to verifying that the stated losses did occur, the Panel considered the reasonableness of the Claimants actions and the amounts claimed.

In the claim under review, the Panel finds that the claimant has not provided sufficient evidence in support of the alleged contracts and recommends no compensation for the loss.

In those cases, the E4 Panel recommended no compensation for the claims when they were reviewed, as the E4 claimants had not submitted sufficient information or documents to support their asserted losses.

Based on the claimants classification of their claims, 42 Governments and 3 international organizations submitted 298 category F claims seeking compensation for a total amount of approximately 141 billion United States dollars ( US ) for their alleged losses.This report adopts the currency abbreviations contained in Terminology Bulletin No. 343, Currency Units (United Nations Publication, Sales No. A C E F R S.91.I.16)(ST CS SER.F 343).

In many of the Claims the Claimants documentary or other evidence established that an alleged loss had, in fact, occurred.

Under this loss type, claimants may submit claims for medical, burial and other expenses and for the loss of support resulting from the death of their spouse, child or parent (collectively called C3 Money claims).

Iran, therefore, could have included these claim units in the submissions that it filed within these deadlines.

Saudi Arabia states that all the compensatory projects should be viewed holistically as measures to compensate for the damage to its resources.

At times the claim preparers appeared to be more familiar with the claims than the claimants.

In the view of the Panel, this should involve the services of a qualified senior epidemiologist.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

The work described above is referred to by the Claimant as the Well Blowout Control ( WBC ) Exercise.

This is the twenty sixth report to the Governing Council of the United Nations Compensation Commission (the Commission or UNCC ) submitted pursuant to article 37(e) of the Provisional Rules for Claims Procedure (S AC.26 1992 10) (the Rules ) by the D1 Panel of Commissioners (the Panel ), being one of two Panels appointed to review individual claims for damages above 100,000 United States dollars (USD) (category D claims).

This is the twenty third report to the Governing Council of the United Nations Compensation Commission (the Commission ) submitted pursuant to article 38(e) of the Provisional Rules for Claims Procedure (S AC.26 1992 10) (the Rules ) by the D1 Panel of Commissioners (the Panel ), being one of two Panels appointed to review individual claims for damages above 100,000 United States dollars (USD) (category D claims).

One claim in the sixth instalment was found to be a duplicate of a claim awarded compensation in the fifth instalment.

The Panel finds that two of the claims do not meet the criteria for compensability of the asserted losses, while another is a duplicate claim.

A total of 37 confirmed matches were identified, which related either to claims filed by the same claimant within the bedoun programme or to claims filed by the same claimant in different claim categories.

The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim provided additional evidence and claimed for losses in addition to those losses claimed by the E4 claimant.