Revised awards for the twenty ninth instalment claims by UNCC claim number and claimant name 46

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment stand alone claims by UNCC claim number and claimant name 23

Moreover, the buyer claimed that the seller, in the course of their dealings, had not objected to claims for damages filed untimely.

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment E2 claim by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 43

Revised awards for the twenty ninth instalment claims by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 47

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment stand alone claims by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 24

The State party's authorities complied with their duty to initiate a proper investigation, and carried it out with due diligence and expedition in order to determine whether or not an act of racial discrimination took place.

Where the Panel recommends an upward adjustment to an award, the revised recommendation is, nevertheless, capped at the amount of consolidated losses asserted by both claimants.

However, the Board was unable to confirm that individual category B awards were supported by sufficiently independent evidence to substantiate the losses claimed.

Another is the circumstance, asserted by some claimant wives, that they believed they would not get anything from the Commission's compensation programme.

(d) The amount of compensation payable for injury, illness or death of any single individual, including for the types of loss and expenses described in subparagraph (a) above, shall not exceed a maximum of 50,000 United States dollars, provided, however, that within such limitation the actual amount is to be determined by reference to local compensation standards

Questions were raised concerning the nature of the liability of the certification authority, in particular whether such liability would be based on negligence or whether it would be defined as strict liability , a notion which was also referred to as objective liability or no fault liability .

The Panel finds that two of the claims do not meet the criteria for compensability of the asserted losses, while another is a duplicate claim.

The difference between the selected higher amounts and the lower amounts will be set off against any awards recommended to the claimants for their category C late claims .

Reparation should be proportional to the gravity of the violations and the harm suffered.

As a result of these findings, the Panel recommends no award of compensation for the asserted business losses.

In paragraph 1 it is stated that the general liability is based on negligence.

The Panel is of the view that these alterations were designed to increase the claimants' recovery by bolstering the evidence supporting the asserted losses.

Reparation should be proportional to the gravity of the violations and the harm suffered.

In this claim, which was submitted on a category E (corporate) claim form, the Claimant seeks compensation in the amount of US 951,630,871 for the costs allegedly incurred in

Regarding the modalities of compensation, section 5, subsection 1, provides that compensation vouchers will be issued for the total amount of compensation.

40. The right to reparation entails both individual measures and general, collective measures.

Reparation

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

4.3 The State party claims that the complainant received the full compensation awarded to him by the court.

233. The concept of indemnification covers both indemnification for work accidents and indemnification for unjustified dismissal.

Loss of profits Fourteen of the claims in this instalment seek compensation for loss of profits for a total asserted value of KWD 1,278,108 (approximately USD 4,422,519).

Receivables Seven of the claims in this instalment seek compensation for receivables for a total asserted value of KWD 852,471 (approximately USD 2,949,727).

Number of claims recommended for payment

IV. COMPENSABILITY OF THE CLAIMS

Number of Claims Recommended for Payment

Compensation

II. RESTITUTION 24 34 6

II. RESTITUTION

My pay?

He contends that otherwise states would in effect be able to use civil damages awards to pay themselves out of the most serious human rights violations.

This is the twenty sixth report to the Governing Council of the United Nations Compensation Commission (the Commission or UNCC ) submitted pursuant to article 37(e) of the Provisional Rules for Claims Procedure (S AC.26 1992 10) (the Rules ) by the D1 Panel of Commissioners (the Panel ), being one of two Panels appointed to review individual claims for damages above 100,000 United States dollars (USD) (category D claims).

(ii) Insurance Claims and Compensation Section

Reparation must always be commensurate with the gravity of the violations and the injury suffered.

Reparation for injury

Forms of reparation

B. Compensatory payments

Limitation levels

Compensation for damage

Forms of reparation