Do they make sense?

Is it sensitive? Yes.

Are the cells going to tolerate it? Will the immune system react?

But still, will the society, would they accept such a radical idea?

And the idea is can we do the same for this?

And should they?

This weapon didn't seem right.

May I ask NAM whether in fact it still holds to that view?

We can prove whether it was living membrane by giving it a very strong electrical charge.

If there is more than one agency involved, do these agencies share information and do they coordinate their activities?

Let's see if I can make it easier.

Did you turn down 1.000.000 for it?

Is it fragile? No, it's not really very fragile.

File already exists. Do you want to overwrite it?

Would you like to be informed about other lines that cannot be read?

Did you know this statue was given to us by the French?

Does it match one African or the other African?

I'm not sure I really even want it to.

It is not a question of their being able to move within the State.

It contains whether kids can talk to their parents, whether they have books at home, what immunization rates are like, whether there's bullying at school.

So it's not a matter of whether it's going to happen. It is going to happen.

It would help to determine the comparability of national inventories.

Tomorrow I'll tell you if we split up or stay together.

Choose whether you already have translation files on disk, or if you want to download them now.

I don't know if I'd try that yet, but that's available.

We were at the point of having one word do we have it?

I know that word, but are you sure it is the right one here?

Effective implementation of the plan of action of the forum will depend on the funds available to it.

Or use it.

I wasn t actually very interested in whether they were all different.

Whether to keep the tasks dialog above other windows when shown.

May I take it that the Conference agrees to these requests?

I do not deny its beauty, but it's a waste of electricity.

You have to earn it, though. Otherwise, no muleta for you.

It goes into a sort of denial negates the signals.

Morocco had acted lawlessly, and the question was whether the United Nations was willing or able to restrain its lawlessness.

It questions whether or not there really are any new frontiers out there, whether there are any real, true, hardcore discoveries that can still be made.

The big question is whether it will function as intended and survive permanently. There is a serious risk that it will not.

Was this choice dictated by the Bretton Woods institutions?

They would argue that the plant was there whether the product was manufactured or not.

It died in large part because it lacked constituent buy in it lacked stakeholder traction.

It could, for example, introduce a mechanism for monitoring the validity of objections.

The Committee was a unique body of its kind, in which the right of veto did not exist.

The pressure's going to go up, and let's see if we can calculate it.

You can't deny it's good.