One reviewer for a Roman Catholic newspaper called it totalitarian.

This is Richard Serra.

In the 20th century, it was totalitarianism.

It was an extremely important human rights issue for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to safeguard its national sovereignty and to protect its people from an armed invasion by the United States.

Aren't those just the foundations of xenophobia and authoritarianism and Puritanism?

The observer for Interfaith International spoke about the lack of justice in countries with totalitarian regimes and mentioned the examples of Cambodia and the Soviet Union.

Terrorists in Nepal are spreading violence in the name of the outdated, rejected and failed ideology of totalitarianism.

The principle of responsible sovereignty includes not only a State's privileges, but also its obligation to protect human rights, the rule of law, democracy and the welfare of its own people, as well as its obligations towards other States.

Moreover, it should find ad hoc solutions for countries in transition from totalitarianism or institutional anarchy to democracy.

Without prejudice to addressing the causes of terrorism, injustice, discrimination, the denial of human rights, the flouting of the rights of peoples, and obliviousness to the positive nature of cultural diversity, the fight against and punishment of terrorism are an unshirkable national and international duty.

Indonesian leaders and the Indonesian people have shown a remarkable sense of pragmatism in welcoming Timor Leste as a sovereign, independent nation.

Is it totalitarian to require reading, writing and arithmetic?

The Council further expresses its regret that certain States are continuing to shelter extremist terrorist elements on grounds of protecting human rights.

With the dismantling of the regime in South Africa which had applied apartheid, racist and xenophobic doctrines and attitudes as global phenomena had assumed greater importance in United Nations efforts to abolish racism.

Now more than ever the international community had to confront terrorism in all its forms, whether State terrorism or individual terrorism based on blind extremism.

Terrorism and extremism constitute a continuous threat to the peace, security and stability of all countries and peoples.

States in general, and the international community in particular, are therefore duty bound to condemn it unequivocally and to combat it relentlessly.

Life under totalitarianism was an extreme situation that requires us to apply special, nuanced rules to

When it is challenged by non State actors, States have a positive obligation to ensure the enjoyment of this right.

Terrorism not only impacts negatively on human rights but on the economic and social development of countries.

The Cuban regime had no right to criticize any country where democracy was flouring anew.

In the face of the totalitarian challenges of fascism and communism in the twentieth century, Europe and the United States have become aware that the rule of law, separation of powers, and democracy decisively determine foreign policy and matter greatly from the point of view of international security. Democracies have proved to be much more peaceful than authoritarian regimes and dictatorships.

PEOPLE apos S REPUBLIC OF KOREA The Democratic People apos s Republic of Korea, as a party to major human rights instruments, has been actively participating in the discussion of human rights issues and contributing to the protection and promotion of human rights at the international level.

Germans have firmly rejected xenophobia, racism and rightist extremism.

With regard to terrorism, the document makes no reference whatever to a fact that constantly impairs the sovereignty of weak countries, namely, State terrorism.

They strike the right dynamic balance between religion and politics, avoiding the extremes of anti religious clericalism and religious clericalism and allowing a symbiotic relationship, governed by principles of neutrality, tolerance and equity, between the State and religions.

Any comprehensive definition of terrorism would need to include State terrorism and distinguish terrorism from the right to self determination.

Extremism, fundamentalism and tribalism will reign supreme.

17. Neo fascism and neo Nazism are gaining ground in many countries, especially in Europe.

To participate in the drafting of international legal instruments concerning the fight against terrorism, separatism and extremism

OHCHR also actively supported the work of UNCT thematic groups.

To assist the competent agencies of SCO member States in efforts to combat terrorism, separatism and extremism

Instead, it had persisted in imposing a totalitarian state that deprived the Cuban people of the right to express dissent and of a voice in any kind of possible political and economic reform.

Duties of States regarding terrorist acts and human rights

Terrorism flourishes in environments of despair, humiliation, poverty, political oppression, extremism and human rights abuse it also flourishes in contexts of regional conflict, and it profits from weak State capacity to maintain law and order.

Pursuant to the Civil Law every person shall have fishing rights within the boundaries of her his property and an owner may restrict the fishing rights of third persons, as far as it is not otherwise prescribed by law. Every Latvian citizen can fish freely in littoral waters in accordance with the procedure provided for in the Fishery Law.

The phenomenon of extremism, violence and terrorism

Like the peoples of other United Nations Members who have fought for their freedom, thousands of Nicaraguans have died for it, victims of a perverse pendulum that swung from authoritarianism to totalitarianism.

In order to enable a judge to determine whether a given State is fulfilling its human rights obligations towards individuals, much more precision is required when the violation of a social right is invoked (requiring a positive intervention from the State), than when the violation of a civil right is invoked (requiring essentially a negative obligation of non interference).

But a totalitarian regime that forces its political opponents to flee, presents special circumstances.

Interference in the internal affairs of Afghanistan by certain outside forces and the establishment in that country of an extremist regime which brutally tramples on human rights and protects terrorism and drug trafficking create a direct threat to the sovereign borders of the Commonwealth of Independent States.

Organize workshops to further develop understanding of the human rights obligations of States in counter terrorism action.

Moreover, totalitarian methods including intimidation, political and administrative sanctions, and even deportation were being used to put pressure on activists, in violation of all international standards of human rights.

They should stress that the practice of the freedom of opinion can be achieved in a manner not incompatible with divine laws and the public order of a country, such that freedom would not take the shape of invitation to racial and religious hatred and extremism, which lead to terrorism.

As for terrorism, we advocate finding a definition satisfactory to everyone, covering State terrorism and drawing a clear distinction between terrorism and the legitimate resistance of peoples to dictatorship, invasion or foreign occupation, including that which is perversely cloaked in the guise of opportunistic and convenient multilateralism.