(b) To advise both the appellant and the respondent as stated above, the Administrative Law Unit represents the respondent at all stages of the appeals process.

(b) To advise both the appellant and the respondent

For want of details, and in the absence of any justification for his allegations, his application was rejected.

He also argues that the Public Service Act does not apply to universities.

The State party argues that the complainant must plainly have stated his religion in order to obtain the passport.

Don't whine, plead or make speeches.

Life... Has done to us, we cannot excuse or explain.

The complainant's case proves it, the State party argues, as his curriculum vitae shows.

4.11 Lastly, the State party argues that the complainant may apply for permanent residence on humanitarian grounds.

2.4 The complainant argues that he has exhausted domestic remedies.

4.4 The State party also argues that the complaint discloses an abuse of the right of submission, disputing whether the complainant can be considered to have justifiable interest in having his complaint considered by the Committee.

He also contended that the complainant was denied real and fair possibilities of preparing his defence and observed that the State party did not address issues arising from the complainant's trial.

3.8 The Ombudsman shall remain neutral and shall not assume the role of advocate for any party.

His wife contended that, if returned, she would be detained for many years, as the complainant's wife.

Following the Committee's advice that complaint information was confidential, counsel argues his capacity to defend the complainant was significantly reduced, particularly given the disparity of resources available to the State party.

I know why he won't defend himself.

He argues that as there were only questions of law before the appellate courts, he did not make arguments on sufficiency of facts.

4.3 As to the lack of a public hearing, the State party contends that the authors at no time brought such a complaint before the Court of Cassation.

If a formal review letter is prepared before the appeal is filed, that letter may serve as the respondent's reply or may become an integral part of it

4.6 The State party asserts that the communication does not meet the minimum requirements for compatibility with article 22 of the Convention.

Furthermore, the judicial authorities who supervised the whole procedure had never believed such allegations.

I remember her gay charm when she had achieved her own way over something... and her extreme acidity when she didn't.

The State party contends that there is nothing to suggest that the magistrate apos s decision would have been different if another lawyer had represented the author.

11.8 Counsel argues that the reduction in sentence does not affect how the complainant has been treated, is being and will be treated until release.

Their occupational trade unions, governed by the Labour Code, may appear and argue before any court quot .

In other cases, the politicization of human rights claims was used for a similar purpose.

Counsel also argued that the real reason that the complainant had been transferred to the Abu Zaabal facility was because he had lodged a complaint of threatened torture.

As a member of the Bureau, the President considered applications from the defence for the disqualification of judges and applications from two convicted prisoners for commutation of their sentences.

It contends that the complainant's return to Bangladesh would not be in violation of article 3 of the Convention.

The complainant's lawyer requested an adjournment in order that he could read the 2,000 page charge and prepare a defence.

4.3 With respect to the present case, the State party argues that no convincing information has been provided for the delay in submitting the complaint of over 1½ years.

On the State party's arguments concerning timely submission of the complaint, he argues that it was unclear for a long period who was entitled to represent the complainant.

Defenders and lawyers have also courageously started to address the issue of forced confession before the courts, despite the frequent reluctance of court judges to accept their complaints and act upon them.

Counsel argues that once the complainant had been removed and could not be consulted directly, it was necessary to obtain more information about his situation before carefully evaluating, together with his parents, whether it would be productive to file a complaint on his behalf.

It argues that the complainant should have appealed against the royal decrees of 1999 that granted the pardons.

In any event, counsel argues that the complainant's present condition does not establish how he was treated in the past.

3.2 The authors contend that an application for a parent visa made from outside Australia would take several years to resolve.

It contends that the family withdrew its application to the RRT on 12 January 1996.

Moreover, we reaffirm our readiness to make use of our time for interactive debate without written texts.

4.10 The State party contends that the Swedish authorities apply the same test when considering an application for asylum under the Aliens Act as the Committee will do when examining a complaint under the Convention.

However, the Presidium of the Supreme Court considered the author's supervisory complaint' (the complaint forwarded by the Public Defender) and commuted the sentence which had been imposed.

On 15 December 2003, the author contended that he had fully substantiated his claims, and that the State party's observations of 22 October 2003 are without merit.

Given the position occupied by Jean Kambanda at the time, his plea has implications beyond the issue of his own individual responsibility.

During that debate, various delegations reaffirmed their view of unilateral acts as a source of international obligations.

In the source's view, the application should have been granted in order to guarantee the defendant's right to a legal defence.