Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

The Panel's recommendation in respect of claim No. 5000462 is summarized in table 21.

(vii) That female victims are entitled to have accessible means of legal recourse and to seek restitution or compensation

2.1 The author filed a workers compensation claim with the Deputy Commissioner of Worker's Compensation, for redress in respect of injuries he had suffered.

Accordingly, in each case where a claimant seeks an award to undertake compensatory restoration, the Panel has considered whether the claimant has sufficiently established that primary restoration has not or will not fully compensate for the losses.

Number of claims recommended for payment

IV. COMPENSABILITY OF THE CLAIMS

Number of Claims Recommended for Payment

The difference between the selected higher amounts and the lower amounts will be set off against any awards recommended to the claimants for their category C late claims .

Revised awards for the twenty ninth instalment claims by UNCC claim number and claimant name 46

(ii) Insurance Claims and Compensation Section

By Procedural Order No. 6 of the fourth F4 instalment dated 30 April 2004, the Panel deferred the portion of claim No. 5000259 of Kuwait relating to remediation of coastal mudflats to the fifth F4 instalment.

The total amount asserted for claims preparation costs is USD 76,339.12.

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment stand alone claims by UNCC claim number and claimant name 23

UNCC claim number 3013967.

Number of Claims Not Recommended for Payment

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment E2 claim by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 43

Revised awards for the twenty ninth instalment claims by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 47

The results of this analysis showed that the proposed average and median recommended awards for claims in this instalment were lower than those for comparable claimants in the regular category D claims programme.

The Panel recommends no award of compensation for three claims.

Recommended awards for category C claims

IV. COMPENSABILITY OF THE CLAIMS 65 98 18

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment stand alone claims by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 24

Of these, the total amount awarded for 334 claims was increased by USD 2,523,268.24 and the total amount awarded for three claims was decreased by USD 42,543.06.

Of these, the total amount awarded for one claim was increased by USD 682,000 and the total amount awarded for the other claim was decreased by USD 3,234,000.

One claim in the sixth instalment was found to be a duplicate of a claim awarded compensation in the fifth instalment.

The Panel recommends awards of compensation in respect of all 2, C4 CPHO and 19 C4 MV claims and no awards of compensation in respect of five C4 CPHO claims and 6 C4 MV claims in the fourth instalment.

As shown in table 2 below, the Panel recommends a total of USD 25,872,466.70.

UNCC claim numbers 3013911 and 3013912.

Of these, the total amount awarded for two claims was increased by USD 8,000, while the total amount awarded for 54 claims was decreased by USD 114,000.

This fifth instalment reports the adjusted recommended award amounts for such claims.

the fifth instalment of category C claims are not recommended for payment.

It is recommended that no compensation be awarded for the duplicate claim in the sixth instalment.

Iraq asserts that Saudi Arabia has failed to demonstrate that the oil spills adversely affected fish and shrimp catches or fish stocks.

Table 1. Recommended awards for category A claims

Table 2. Recommended awards for category C claims

Accordingly the Panel recommends that no compensation be awarded for this claim.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel's recommendation in respect of claim No. 5000394 is summarized in table 6.

Consequently, Jordan has failed to meet the evidentiary requirements for compensation as specified in article 35(3) of the Rules.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no compensation for this part of the first claim unit.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no compensation for this claim unit.

The Panel also finds that the primary restoration envisaged by the award in the fourth F4 instalment will not fully compensate for the loss resulting from this damage.

Accordingly, the Panel considers that compensatory restoration is appropriate in this case.

Kuwait seeks compensation for 35 deaths, which is their central estimate .