To the State party's knowledge, no such evidence has yet been provided.

Jordanian official briefing of the Monitoring Team provided detailed evidence of the device.

The Panel notes that most of the evidence provided by the Palestinian claimant was original while the Kuwaiti claimant provided copies only.

Such documentary evidence should be provided free of charge, or for a minimal fee.

On the basis of the evidence provided by the claimant, the loss is compensable.

Iraq contends that Iran has not provided sufficient evidence to support the claim unit, and that the documentation and information provided are inadequate.

The Panel considered the evidence originally provided by the individual claimant and his subsequent responses.

The basis of the claim and the evidence provided to support it are similar to those provided in respect of the first claim unit.

On 29 September, the Croatian authorities provided me with indisputable evidence that Ante Gotovina was in Spain.

Iraq contends that Saudi Arabia has not provided evidence of past or current damage to subtidal resources.

Ukraine's recent ratification of the Kyoto Protocol provided further evidence of its contribution to addressing environmental threats.

Ukraine denies them, and both the United States and the European Union say Russia has provided no evidence.

(c) No person shall be arrested solely on the basis of evidence provided by a person already detained.

The organization also provided evidence on age discrimination, abuse and gender based violations of rights to various policy forums.

Nor has the claimant provided any credible evidence of his ownership of the business as at 2 August 1990.

This evidence is the same as that provided by Iran in claim No. 5000288 (paragraphs 208 214 of this report).

The Panel, therefore, concludes that Iran has not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate the circumstances and amount of the losses claimed.

The Panel, therefore, finds that Kuwait has not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate the circumstances and amount of the compensation claimed.

Iraq argues that Syria has provided no evidence of actual damage or details of planned restoration programmes or improved conservation management.

Israeli authorities have provided clear evidence that they will not allow Israeli extremists to prevent the plan from being carried out.

After reviewing the evidence provided by both claimants, the merged E4 Panel made a determination about which claimant had sustained the loss.

The Panel, therefore, finds that Iran has not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate the circumstances and the amount of the losses claimed.

Gender sensitization is also being provided to police, lawyers, magistrates and medical personnel involved in interviewing, collecting and documenting legal and medical evidence.

In advice dated 28 January 2003 provided by Mr. Hammarberg to counsel, the former considered that there was prima facie evidence of torture.

The Panel finds that the claimant has not provided sufficient evidence of his stock and recommends no award of compensation for this loss.

The Panel finds that the evidence provided to support this claim unit is not sufficient to demonstrate the circumstances of the loss claimed.

Iraq states that Iran has not provided any evidence to prove the magnitude of damage or the period over which the damage occurred.

The Panel does not consider that the evidence provided by Iran is sufficient to demonstrate the amount and circumstances of the claimed loss.

The Panel, therefore, concludes that Kuwait has not provided sufficient evidence to enable the Panel to quantify the magnitude of any lost biomass.

The Panel, therefore, concludes that Kuwait has not provided sufficient evidence to establish loss of groundwater production at Raudhatain and Umm Al Aish.

The Panel also finds that insufficient evidence has been provided by Kuwait to justify further monitoring activity in any areas of the mudflats.

He then asserted new losses in respect of a different and unrelated unincorporated business, and provided evidence of the existence of this unrelated business.

The Panel finds that the claimant has not provided sufficient evidence of the food purchases and recommends no award of compensation for that loss.

Where the third party was unable to verify the documents proffered by the claimant or provided statements inconsistent with the information provided by the claimant, the Panel finds the evidence submitted by the claimant to be unreliable.

After considering all of the evidence provided, the Panel determines that the claimant has failed to prove the alleged loss and recommends no award of compensation.

Opportunities for international cooperation, use of international standards, training and evidence based evaluation are highlighted, as are ideas for technical assistance to be provided to developing countries.

The Palestinian individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim has provided evidence to support the claim for loss of stock.

Iraq states that Iran has not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that oil pollution in Iranian waters as a consequence of the conflict affected Iranian fisheries resources.

The Panel, therefore, finds that Kuwait has not provided sufficient evidence to show that there is remaining damage in the mudflats attributable to Iraq's invasion and occupation.

In the view of Iraq, the claim is unjustified because of the insufficient evidence provided and the absence of proof that any loss was incurred by Kuwait.

The Panel, therefore, finds that Syria has not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate a loss of livestock as a result of the oil well fires in Kuwait.

The evidence provided by the claimant in support of this claim indicated that a multiplier of 10 should have been used to calculate the compensation for this claim.

On the merits, the Committee found that the complainant had provided sufficient medical evidence to establish that his expulsion to Mexico would violate article 3 of the Convention.

4.8 The authors have provided no real evidence of the existence of the alleged judgement to which they refer, dated 6 October 1993 and supposedly in their favour.

In contrast, the Kuwaiti claimant was only able to provide general statements regarding the business activities and provided inconsistent statements regarding the origin of some of his evidence.