Divisions in some areas were too deep to be bridged, and some are serious.

Enormous disagreements.

Still, despite the public display of reconciliation, the two still have major differences.

The Great Policy Divergence

Divisions between major powers on key issues have revealed a lack of consensus about goals and methods.

Mr. Filali considered that there was no significant disagreement between the committees.

A failed constitutional process, or one that leaves major divisions, can imperil the electoral phase.

Yet the sectarians differed among themselves. Alas for the unbelievers when they see the Terrible Day!

Yet the sectarians differed among themselves. Alas for the unbelievers when they see the Terrible Day!

Then groups among them differed so ruin is for the disbelievers from the witnessing of a Great Day.

Then groups among them differed so ruin is for the disbelievers from the witnessing of a Great Day.

But the parties have fallen into variance among themselves then woe to those who disbelieve for the scene of a dreadful day.

But the parties have fallen into variance among themselves then woe to those who disbelieve for the scene of a dreadful day.

Then the sects have differed among themselves so woe to those who disbelieve in the witness of a Day Mighty!

Then the sects have differed among themselves so woe to those who disbelieve in the witness of a Day Mighty!

Then the sects differed i.e. the Christians about 'Iesa (Jesus) , so woe unto the disbelievers those who gave false witness by saying that 'Iesa (Jesus) is the son of Allah from the meeting of a great Day (i.e. the Day of Resurrection, when they will be thrown in the blazing Fire).

Then the sects differed i.e. the Christians about 'Iesa (Jesus) , so woe unto the disbelievers those who gave false witness by saying that 'Iesa (Jesus) is the son of Allah from the meeting of a great Day (i.e. the Day of Resurrection, when they will be thrown in the blazing Fire).

But the various factions differed among themselves. So woe to those who disbelieve from the scene of a tremendous Day.

But the various factions differed among themselves. So woe to those who disbelieve from the scene of a tremendous Day.

But different parties began to dispute with one another. A dreadful woe awaits on that great Day for those that reject the Truth.

But different parties began to dispute with one another. A dreadful woe awaits on that great Day for those that reject the Truth.

The sects among them differ but woe unto the disbelievers from the meeting of an awful Day.

The sects among them differ but woe unto the disbelievers from the meeting of an awful Day.

But the factions differed among themselves. So woe to the faithless at the scene of a tremendous day.

But the factions differed among themselves. So woe to the faithless at the scene of a tremendous day.

But the parties have fallen into variance among themselves, then woe to those who disbelieve for the scene of a Dreadful Day.

But the parties have fallen into variance among themselves, then woe to those who disbelieve for the scene of a Dreadful Day.

Then the factions differed concerning Jesus from among them, so woe to those who disbelieved from the scene of a tremendous Day.

Then the factions differed concerning Jesus from among them, so woe to those who disbelieved from the scene of a tremendous Day.

(The followers of Jesus) turned themselves into quarrelling sects. The disbelievers shall face a woeful condition on the great Day (of Judgment).

(The followers of Jesus) turned themselves into quarrelling sects. The disbelievers shall face a woeful condition on the great Day (of Judgment).

But parties from among them disagreed with each other, so woe to those who disbelieve, because of presence on a great day.

But parties from among them disagreed with each other, so woe to those who disbelieve, because of presence on a great day.

Yet different groups differed among themselves. How awful it will be for those who have rejected the truth when a dreadful Day arrives!

Yet different groups differed among themselves. How awful it will be for those who have rejected the truth when a dreadful Day arrives!

But the sects differ among themselves and woe to the unbelievers because of the (coming) Judgment of a Momentous Day!

But the sects differ among themselves and woe to the unbelievers because of the (coming) Judgment of a Momentous Day!

We are determined to cross the divide and not to play into the hands of those who seek to widen the divide.

And behind this powerful disagreement between how to close that gap, there's the worst kind of cynical party politics, the worst kind of insider baseball, lobbying, all of that stuff, but there's also this powerfully interesting, respectful disagreement between two fundamentally different economic philosophies.

There had been a considerable narrowing of differences and the number of controversial points significantly reduced.

Now, here's where our analogy with the Gold Rush starts to diverge, and I think rather severely.

And that calculation isn't much in dispute.

It would prevent the widening of differences within the multilateral system.

The differences on a programme of work are quintessentially political, not procedural.

While there is, in our view, broad consensus regarding the need for Security Council expansion, major differences exist regarding what kind of expansion should occur.