The next thing is What about the footprint? Stewart mentioned the footprint.

This means lower carbon footprint.

People confuse footprint with spacing.

The Shale Revolution s Global Footprint

So let's forget your environmental footprint.

Let's think about your ethical footprint.

Not so much as one blooming' footprint.

That's the footprint that is always being confused.

We have left our footprint on the moon.

One was Ray Anderson, who turned turned, you know, a part of the evil empire into a zero footprint, or almost zero footprint business.

We'll reduce not only calories, but our carbon footprint.

So how can they address this remaining water footprint?

The AMOS satellite had a 750,000 square kilometre footprint.

We'll reduce not only calories, but our carbon footprint.

like a cripple who leaves behind his crooked footprint.

For wind, there's a larger area, but much smaller footprint.

Because when we see someone walks, we see the footprint.

In my experience, in fact, the light footprint was extremely helpful.

I'm an organic food eating, carbon footprint minimizing, robotic surgery geek.

And this doesn't even account for the footprint on the ground.

One of them is that every society has an ecological footprint.

And we would leave a very low footprint on the planet.

In my experience, in fact, the light footprint was extremely helpful.

Or maybe a hunk of cement, and ask for your footprint.

Expanding

Expanding

The United Nations policy in Afghanistan is called the light footprint approach.

Minimum Expanding

The area covered by the bomblets, or submunitions, is known as the footprint'.

At maximum range the footprint approaches a linear release of submunitions over 1200m.

And the final footprint that clearly proves he threw himself in the lake.

And it's expanding.

China s Expanding Core

We had progress in elections all of this with the so called light footprint.

We had progress in elections all of this with the so called light footprint.

Furthermore, it's simply not true that what went wrong in Afghanistan is the light footprint.

That, because the footprint, as you can see, is just the pole touching the ground.

That would take between one and three square kilometers of footprint on the ground, entirely.

Furthermore, it's simply not true that what went wrong in Afghanistan is the light footprint.

The two numbers are zero as in zero footprint or zero oil and scale it infinity.

We reckon that we are a bit over halfway to our goal zero impact, zero footprint.

Multi beam phased arrays would provide fixed beams to give ubiquitous coverage through the satellite footprint.

Show whole thread on expanding

Keep aspect ratio by expanding

3. Multigenerational citizenship expanding awareness