On 2 June 2003, Mr. Choi filed an appeal.

2.11 On 17 December 2002, a new application for humanitarian residence permits was filed.

The author's mother filed a complaint at the police station on the same day.

On 15 February 2002, a second request was filed under section 417, and rejected on 29 March 2003.

He filed a complaint of discrimination based on race with the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

All three filed complaints alleging that they were discriminated against on the basis of handicap.

On 25 November 1996, the court rejected an application for review filed by the author.

A separate and amended indictment against the accused was accordingly filed on 23 February 2005.

On 10 May 2000, a third request under section 417 was filed, which was rejected on 24 November 2000.

On 23 October, on arraignment, the author pleaded not guilty that same day, he filed a petition for bail.

The author filed a counter claim.

The author, who filed his application in 1992, became a Czech citizen on 20 May 1993.

By letter of 15 October 2004, the authors filed additional observations on State party's latest submission.

The author filed an appeal with the Constitutional Court, which was rejected on 25 January 1999.

2.4 On 18 December 1995, Waldemar filed his first motion to replace the author as liquidator.

On 31 March 1998, she filed a complaint with the Rector, claiming that his decision was illegal.

One motion involving seven accused indicted for crimes committed in Kosovo was filed on 1st April 2005.

Complaints regarding detention of individuals are filed

There is no common data base on the number of filed criminal charges against any form of violence.

2.6 On 12 December 2002, DRC filed a complaint with the Commissioner of Police of Copenhagen ( the Commissioner ).

2.7 On 21 May 2003, DRC filed an appeal with the Regional Public Prosecutor of Copenhagen ( the Prosecutor ).

He then filed an appeal in the Prague Town Court, which quashed this decision on 5 May 2004.

The author's son filed a request for presidential pardon, but his request was denied on 23 May 2001.

On 25 September 1989, the company filed a suit in the Court for Administrative Affaires of First Instance.

Prosecutors analysed the results of these investigations and the Unit filed its last indictment on 17 December 2004.

Proceedings were instituted on 18 November 2004 by an application filed on behalf of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines against Guinea Bissau.

On 29 October 2002, they filed a cassation appeal in the Minsk City Court the appeal was dismissed on 28 November 2002.

4.1 On 3 February 1999, the State party commented on the admissibility of the communication and on 10 August 1999, it filed observations on the merits.

The one individual claim that was not filed through the Palestinian late claims programme was originally filed in the regular filing period for individual claims.

2.3 On 8 October 2002, DRC filed a complaint with the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority, which monitors financial companies.

The author filed an appeal with the Provincial High Court of Oviedo, which was rejected on 3 October 1998.

2.4 On 24 December 1997, the author filed a complaint against the HREOC in the Federal Court of Australia.

On 26 March 1991, the company filed a motion to link the buyers of ENTEL's assets to the proceedings.

The company considered that the costs for carrying out the work had risen disproportionately and, on 7 October 1988, filed and administrative claim against the Province of Neuquén, which was dismissed in 1989, for having been filed out of time.

Accordingly, Mr. Bohsali filed for fraud against the author.

The lawyers acting on behalf of Mr. El Derini filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the third detention order.

On 14 April 2003, they filed an application for supervisory review in the Supreme Court of Belarus this was dismissed on 30 May 2003.

We filed the patent for her, the National Innovation Foundation.

No form of appeal or other judicial initiative was filed.

They filed a petition against this practice of admission quotas.

At 4 20 a.m., the applicant filed a pre litigation property preservation and were received patiently by judicial police on duty.

(c) On 13 March 1997, the author filed a complaint of ill treatment against the authorities of the Puerto I penitentiary.

On 3 February 1995, the Superior Court admitted the appeal filed by the company against the judgement of 12 July 1994.

On 4 July 1996, two years late, the company filed a complaint in the Court for Administrative Affairs of First Instance.

The author filed an application for review of that decision, an application that was rejected by the court on 7 July 1998.