As at 2 September 2005, there were 91 women in immigration detention.

On 2 May 2000, the complainant was detained in immigration detention for purposes of removal.

Of these, 69 women were in immigration detention facilities and 22 were in community based arrangements.

On 7 June 2002, the Immigration and Naturalization Service took custody of Mr. Ali, charged him as removable under immigration laws because of his previous conviction, placed him in removal proceedings and transferred him to immigration detention.

The Australian Government has a strong commitment to responding to the needs of women and children in immigration detention.

At no time during the civil proceedings instituted against him has he been subject to mandatory detention under United States immigration law.

On 17 June 2005, the Prime Minister announced a number of changes to both the law and the handling of matters relating to people in immigration detention.

Such altercations between authorities competent in immigration matters repeatedly occurred decisions favourable to Mr. Ali were later set aside by other authorities but he remained in detention.

The Working Group conveys its appreciation to the Government for having submitted information reporting that the above mentioned three persons are no longer held in immigration detention.

As at 29 July 2005, all families with children were moved from immigration detention facilities and placed in the community under residence determination arrangements. This is in line with a number of legislative changes to the Migration Act 1958 that came into effect on 29 June 2005, in order to ensure that the current immigration detention policy is administered with greater flexibility, fairness and in a more timely manner.

It is the Government's intention that where primary assessment is being made, removal is imminent or conditions of alternative detention have been breached, families (including fathers) will be housed in a housing project in the capital city of their prior residence (where available) rather than in an immigration detention centre.

The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs now has a non compellable, non delegable power to specify alternative arrangements for a person's detention and the conditions that will apply to that person.

His stay in an immigration detention centre has been marked by preferential treatment and Government spokespersons were time and again forced to resort to verbal gymnastics to avoid using the word terrorist to describe him.

Immigration

Immigration Bureau

Europe s Immigration Challenge

Taking Back Immigration

The Immigration Game

1.1 The complainant is Mr. P.A.C., a Sri Lankan national of Tamil ethnic origin born on 15 March 1976 and, at the time of submission of the complaint, detained in immigration detention awaiting removal from Australia to Sri Lanka.

During the almost three years which he spent in detention since then, the immigration authorities conducted various inquiries to find out whether Mr. Ali's release pending determination of his status would represent a danger for the community, or a flight risk.

The UK s Immigration Distraction

Inequality, Immigration, and Hypocrisy

America s Misguided Immigration Debate

Immigration and American Power

Immigration law and practice

Customs, borders and immigration

General Coordinator of Immigration Police

Illegal detention

Preventative Detention

Arbitrary detention

Arbitrary detention

But for me, so is immigration.

Immigration and the New Class Divide

Issues relating to customs and immigration

Acceleration of immigration and customs procedures

Acceleration of immigration and customs procedures

B. Pretrial detention

Arbitrary detention 114

2005 Arbitrary detention

Given Western Europe's growing need for labor in the years ahead, the question is not whether to have immigration, but only where that immigration is going to come from. Will it be the legal immigration of easily assimilated people from Central and Eastern Europe, or illegal immigration from the Maghreb?

Mr. Ali appeared before an immigration judge in Chicago on 10 October 2002, at a hearing to determine his immigration status.

Reaffirms emphatically the duty of States parties to ensure full respect for and observance of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, particularly with regard to the right of foreign nationals, regardless of their immigration status, to communicate with a consular official of their own State in the case of detention, and the obligation of the State in whose territory the detention occurs to inform the foreign national of that right

Substantive issues Arbitrary detention right to take proceedings before court to challenge lawfulness of detention

Approximately 79 per cent of the overall cost for detention services relates to detention guards.

As a consequence of these changes, families with children who enter into immigration detention (primarily as a result of compliance action, where people have overstayed their visa, or had their visa cancelled) will, within four to six weeks of being detained, be considered for residence determination.