Guidelines for review under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol

Guidelines for review under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol

Training programme for members of expert review teams for the initial review under the guidelines for review under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol

Guidelines for review under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol 40

This information will be subject to review in accordance with Article 8.

Objectives The objectives for review under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol are

Review, pursuant to article 22, paragraph 2(d), of the Convention, of the

Review, pursuant to article 22, paragraph 2(d), of the Convention, of the

Competences required to be members of the expert review teams for the review of annual information submitted under Article 7, paragraph 1 are

During the review upon expiration of the additional period for fulfilling commitments, the expert review team shall review the information submitted by the Party under Article 7, paragraph 1, to assess whether

The Review Conference could reiterate the following understanding of the obligations contained in article X

The Committee's work under article 20 of the Convention continued during the period under review.

The Committee observes that this article does not guarantee review by more than one tribunal.

REQUESTS BY CLAIMANTS FOR ARTICLE 41 CORRECTIONS During the period under review, the secretariat has continued its review of requests from Governments for corrections to claims in categories D , E and F , submitted under article 41 of the Rules.

In the period under review, one more State has made the declaration under article 14 Georgia.

Review of the implementation of the Convention and of its institutional arrangements, pursuant to article 22,

Subject to a review under Article 8 and the acceptance of the revised estimate by the expert review team, the revised estimate shall replace the adjusted estimate.

(k) Urged States parties to review whether they had fulfilled the reporting obligations referred to in the Convention, in particular in article 5, paragraph 3, article 16, paragraph 5, article 18, paragraphs 13 and 14, and article 31, paragraph 6

Welcoming also the successful outcome of the Sixth Review Conference, which adopted a Final DocumentBWC CONF.VI 6. after a gap of ten years,The previous full review was conducted at the Fourth Review Conference in 1996. conducted a consensus article by article review of the operation of the Convention and reached decisions on the continuity of the intersessional meetings of experts and States parties,

The review of the national communication shall also cover supplementary information reported under Article 7, paragraph 2.

The Committee continued its work under article 8 of the Optional Protocol during the period under review.

Initial review of essential use nominations for 2007 submitted by non Article 5 Parties (in metric tonnes)

REVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ITS INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 22, PARAGRAPH 2(A) AND (B), AND ARTICLE 26 OF THE CONVENTION

The secretariat shall select the members of the review teams to review the annual information submitted under Article 7, paragraph 1, and to review national communications and the supplementary information under Article 7, paragraph 2, in a way that the collective skills of the team address the areas mentioned in paragraphs 29 and 30 above, respectively.

(b) Review of the implementation of the Convention and of its institutional arrangements, pursuant to article 22, paragraph 2 (a) and (b), and article 26 of the Convention

Recognizing the importance of transparent reporting for facilitating the review process under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol,

Part VI Review of information on the minimization of adverse impacts in accordance with Article 3, paragraph 14

E. Processing information regarding the removal of chemicals and forwarding it to the Chemical Review Committee (article 9)

Therefore, in order to determine whether UN Model article 26 should be updated, it is advisable to review the changes in 2003 OECD article 26 made by the OECD Fiscal Committee in issuing 2005 OECD article 26.

During the review upon expiration of the additional period for fulfilling commitments, the expert review team shall review the information submitted in accordance with paragraph 20 of the annex to decision CMP.1 (Article 7) in accordance with paragraph 88 above.

Table 2 Initial review of essential use nominations for 2007 submitted by non Article 5 Parties (in metric tonnes)

CMP.1 Guidelines for review under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol (FCCC KP CMP 2005 3 Add.2)

Article 9 The CSRC shall set up a Review Committee of Merger, Acquisition and Reorganization of Listed Companies (hereinafter referred to as the review committee ) in the Issuance Examination Committee, and shall vote on the material assets reorganization application submitted by the review committee and provide review opinions.

Expert review teams shall, under their collective responsibility, calculate, document and recommend adjustments in accordance with the provisions for the review of annual inventories under Article 8 and this technical guidance.

Recognizing the importance of the review process under Article 8 for the implementation of other provisions of the Kyoto Protocol,

Collective understandings of what the article VI obligation means in practice have been gradually developed through the Treaty review process.

Article 16 of the Convention requires that the Conference of the Parties (COP) periodically review the effectiveness of the Convention this review will enable the COP to assess whether Convention requirements are adequate.

Noting the provisions of article VIII, paragraph 3, of the Treaty regarding the convening of review conferences at five year intervals,

Noting the provisions of article VIII, paragraph 3, of the Treaty regarding the convening of review conferences at five year intervals,

The draft decision on guidance for review under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol is attached to decision 23 CP.7.

Noting the provisions of article VIII, paragraph 3, of the Treaty regarding the convening of review conferences at five year intervals,

C. Processing proposals for the listing of severely hazardous pesticide formulations and forwarding them to the Chemical Review Committee (article 6)

Each initial report will be subject to review in accordance with the relevant provisions of draft decision CMP.1 (Article 8).

Review of the operation of the Treaty in accordance with article VIII, paragraph 3, of the Treaty, taking into account the Decisions and the Resolution adopted by the 1995 Review and Extension Conference and the Final documents of the 1975, 1985 and 2000 Review Conferences

Each submission under Article 7 shall be assigned to a single expert review team that shall be responsible for performing the review in accordance with the procedures and time frames established in these guidelines.