The issue arose in the course of the proceedings as to whether the WBC Claim can properly be categorized as a category E (corporate) claim.

This issue and the related issue of the Claimant s standing to pursue the WBC Claim are considered by the Panel as preliminary issues.

It is up to a party to preserve his claim by putting the issue in a timely fashion.

That claim was not at issue in his earlier case, in respect of which views were adopted in July 1994.

First, some claim that anti personnel mines are a humanitarian issue which does not really fall in the Conference apos s purview.

This separate opinion emphasizes that a claim of discrimination which raises an issue of substance requiring consideration on the merits should be found admissible.

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Indeed, the author did not address such a claim to the Human Rights Committee in his original communication in September 1997, adding the issue only in 1999.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

The Commission might therefore wish to examine the issue of protective measures taken by a diplomatic or consular mission which might be precursors to a claim for protection.

The Claim

The claim

Overlapping claim

Claim form

What claim?

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

The Council is not entitled to address the issue of the European Community's responsibility, although the member States against which the claim is brought are merely implementing an EC regulation.

The primary issue for the Panel in its review of the current F3 claim was whether the salary payments were a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Eritrean Claim Line

Ancestral land claim

(THE WBC CLAIM )

Facts and claim

4. Claim for _

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

It recalls its jurisprudence that in regard to a claim such as that at issue in the present case, the authors have no standing under article 1 of the Optional Protocol.

At issue was whether the requirement should apply until the resolution of the dispute or the date of an award or judgement, or only until the official presentation of the claim.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

6.5 As to the State party's claim that the authors failed to exhaust domestic remedies in relation to his claim of prohibited discrimination, the Committee recalls that the authors did not invoke the specific issue of discrimination before the Czech courts accordingly, they have not exhausted domestic remedies in this respect.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Regarding the issue of lack of access to counsel and delayed judicial process, especially with regard to Chief Abiola, one representative pointed out that the claim did not reflect the true situation.

UNCC claim No. 3012412.

UNCC claim No. 3012161

UNCC claim No. 3011290

UNCC claim No. 3011328

UNCC claim No. 3010941