On 19 November 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the author's application and on 24 December 1999, rejected his appeal from the Court of Appeal.

Later, and fairly recently, acquitted on appeal in fact, on the second appeal.

The Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal on 3 October 1988.

2.7 On 28 June 1999, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

On 23 February 1990, the Court of Appeal of Versailles dismissed his appeal.

On 6 October 2000, upon appeal, the Borgarting Court of Appeal upheld this decision.

His application for leave to appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 29 February 1988 a reasoned appeal judgement was issued on 14 March 1988.

The appeal was adopted at the general gathering of refugees from Khodjaly region on 19 February 2005.

The Court of Appeal of Jamaica dismissed their appeal against conviction on 31 October 1986.

Their appeal was refused by the Court of Appeal of Jamaica on 16 July 1990.

Their appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal of Jamaica on 16 July 1990.

His appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal of Jamaica on 7 December 1990.

His appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal of Jamaica on 16 May 1990.

272. On 4 January, an administrative detainee from Abud village was released from Damon Prison following an appeal filed in December 1997.

Sat on Court of Appeal on many occasions as Acting Justice of Appeal and on one occasion continuously for almost a year.

If special leave to appeal were granted, a three week period from the granting of special leave to appeal would apply for the filing of the notice of appeal.

Based on 2005 Appeal should there be a need to launch another appeal during 2006 2007

The Court of Appeal of Jamaica dismissed the author apos s appeal on 22 May 1987.

It was recommended that the time for filing a notice of appeal from a sentencing Judgement be reduced from 75 days to 30 days, for filing the appeal brief from 75 to 30 days, and for filing a response to the appeal brief from 40 to 30 days.

Activities of recurrent nature transferred from the Emergency Appeal budget

His appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 4 February 1987, nearly three years later.

The Court of Appeal of Jamaica dismissed their application for leave to appeal on 12 October 1987.

In addition, he sent an urgent appeal on behalf of one person, and received a reply from the Government.

The Special Rapporteur transmitted one urgent appeal on behalf of one person and received a reply from the Government.

On 29 October 2002, they filed a cassation appeal in the Minsk City Court the appeal was dismissed on 28 November 2002.

Of the 12 judges of the Supreme Court, eight were obliged to disqualify themselves from sitting on his appeal on grounds of possible bias.

The Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal and the Chief Justice confirmed the death sentence on 30 January 1997.

2.6 The Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago dismissed the author apos s appeal on 9 March 1987.

His appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed by the Court of Appeal of Jamaica on 18 June 1990.

His application for leave to appeal was heard by the Jamaican Court of Appeal on 23 July 1990 and dismissed on 24 September 1990.

To date, the appeal has not received the desired response from donors.

For the first time, the 2005 appeal preparation benefited from a gender adviser, provided by UNIFEM, to mainstream gender issues in the annual appeal.

Furthermore, decisions resulting from such mechanisms did not allow for appeal and were based principally on considerations of a political nature.

In response to the first flash appeal on 11 November, a total of US 10.8 million was received from various donors.

On appeal, the Frankfurt Court of Appeal quashed that decision and referred the matter back to the Frankfurt Regional Court.

On 16 November 1990, the Court of Appeal of Jamaica dismissed his application for leave to appeal against his conviction.

On 2 June 2003, Mr. Choi filed an appeal.

It appears from the information before the Committee that seven years and five months elapsed before the Court of Appeal heard and dismissed his appeal.

9.3 As regards the claim that Mr. Burrell apos s representation on appeal was inadequate, the Committee notes that it appears from the judgement of the Court of Appeal that Mr. Burrell apos s legal aid counsel for the appeal (who had not represented him at the trial) conceded at the hearing that there was no merit in the appeal.

The Ministry of Interior decided on his appeal on 17 June 1998.

The Special Rapporteur transmitted to the Government an urgent appeal on behalf of two people, and received a reply from the Government.

He claims that he was denied the right to appeal from this decision.

The author's appeal to the Supreme Court was declared inadmissible on 26 September 1996, and an appeal to the Constitutional Court was dismissed on procedural grounds on 7 October 1998.

4.7 On 3 June 2002 the Board rejected the appeal.

On 19 February 1999, the Federal Court dismissed the appeal.