1. Any State Party may denounce the present Protocol at any time by written notification addressed to the Secretary General of the United Nations, who shall thereafter inform the other States Parties to the present Protocol and the Convention.

1. A State Party may denounce this Protocol by written notification to the Secretary General of the United Nations.

A State Party may denounce this Protocol by written notification to the Secretary General of the United Nations.

A State Party may denounce this Protocol by written notification to the Secretary General of the United Nations.

Apart from the designation of operational entities, where the COP MOP has an advisory role, the COP MOP can reverse such technical decisions.

52.1 At any time after this Protocol has entered into force with respect to a Party, that Party may withdraw from this Protocol by giving written notification to the Depositary.

At any time after this Protocol has entered into force with respect to a Party, that Party may withdraw from this Protocol by giving written notification to the Depositary.

Some doubt was expressed whether it was necessary that this agreement be in writing.

(a) Concerns a State that is not a party to the Protocol

In doing so, decision 24 CP.8 did not recommend a draft decision to COP MOP as it was intended that the annex to that decision be included in a COP MOP decision covering more comprehensive guidance in relation to registry systems.

1. Any State Party may denounce the present Protocol at any time by written notification addressed to the Secretary General of the United Nations, who shall thereafter inform the other States Parties to the present Protocol and the Convention. Denunciation shall take effect one year after the date of receipt of the notification by the Secretary General.

At any time after three years from the date on which the Protocol has entered into force for a Party, that Party may withdraw from the Protocol by giving written notification to the Depositary.

At any time after three years from the date on which this Protocol has entered into force for a Party, that Party may withdraw from this Protocol by giving written notification to the Depositary.

3. A State Party to this Convention is not bound by a protocol unless it becomes a Party to the protocol in accordance with the provisions thereof.

1. Any State Party may denounce this Protocol at any time by written notification addressed to the Secretary General of the United Nations.

The contract should be mutually negotiated and agreed to in writing or electronically

A State Party may denounce the present Protocol by written notification to the Secretary General of the United Nations. The denunciation shall become effective one year after the date of receipt of the notification by the Secretary General.

Parties to the Protocol will contribute to both, whereas those Parties that have not ratified the Protocol will contribute to the Convention only.

1. Any State Party may withdraw from this Protocol by written notification to the Secretary General of the United Nations.

(a) The contract shall be mutually negotiated and agreed to in writing or electronically

1. Any State party may denounce the present Protocol at any time by written notification to the Secretary General of the United Nations, who shall thereafter inform the other States parties to the Convention and all States which have signed the Convention.

Neither the Kyoto Protocol, nor decisions recommended for adoption by the COP MOP specify the designated entity that will operate the financial mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol.

1. A State Party may denounce this Protocol by written notification to the Secretary General of the United Nations. Such denunciation shall become effective one year after the date of receipt of the notification by the Secretary General.

In this context, the Commission welcomed the adoption and the opening for signature of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and urged the international community, and in particular annex 1 parties to that Convention, to become Parties to the Kyoto Protocol as soon as possible in order to facilitate its early entry into force.84

An amendment to the Kyoto Protocol would require submission of a written proposed text six months in advance of the COP MOP session and adoption of the amendment by consensus if possible.

Decision of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol, supported by unilateral declarations of Parties, to confer privileges and immunities

As part of those efforts, Australia is conducting outreach to regional countries on agreements such as the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and the Additional Protocol.

For the purpose of rules 26 and 27, Parties to the Convention that are not Parties to the Kyoto Protocol may exercise the same rights as all other observers.

A Contracting Party may denounce the present Convention by written notification to the Secretary General of the United Nations.

Protocol amending the 31 January 1963 Convention Supplementary to the Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris Convention) of 29 July 1960, as amended by the Additional Protocol of 28 January 1964

This is apparent from the definition given in the Convention of the term treaty , which means an international agreement whatever its particular designation .

When the Conference of the Parties exercises its functions as the Meeting of the Parties to this Protocol, decisions under this Protocol shall be taken only by those of its members that are, at that time, Parties to this Protocol.

Decision 17 CP.9 includes a recommended draft COP MOP decision which states that credentials from Parties to the Kyoto Protocol would apply for the participation of their representatives in sessions of the COP and the COP MOP, and a single report on credentials would be submitted for approval, following established procedures, by the Bureau of the COP to the COP and to the COP MOP.

In order for the MOU between the COP and the GEF to be made operational for the Kyoto Protocol, the COP MOP will have to give its approval by confirming the arrangements.

A possible way to achieve the same result as an amendment to the Kyoto Protocol, but without its attendant complexities, would be for the COP MOP to include in such a decision a provision calling on Parties to make a unilateral declaration that they will implement the decision of the COP MOP in their national law.

Last year we were able to complete Protocol II and the CTBT in parallel.

Decides to commence consideration of the issue of an amendment to the Kyoto Protocol in respect of procedures and mechanisms relating to compliance in terms of Article 18, with a view to making a decision by the third session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol

Furthermore, having already ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), his Government intended to sign the Protocol thereto.

A range of measures could be adopted by the COP MOP to help address the present situation where individuals carrying out tasks mandated by the COP MOP are obliged to bear the risk of lawsuits against them. These measures, which are not mutually exclusive, include

The States Parties to the present Protocol,

The States Parties to this Protocol,

The enforcement branch shall forthwith, through the secretariat, notify the Party concerned in writing of its final decision.

The enforcement branch shall forthwith, through the secretariat, notify the Party concerned in writing of its final decision.

Background The Kyoto Protocol states When the Conference of the Parties serves as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol, any member of the Bureau of the Conference of the Parties representing a Party to the Convention but, at that time, not a Party to this Protocol, shall be replaced by an additional member to be elected by and from amongst the Parties to this Protocol (Article 13, paragraph 3).

In this context, we consider the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement (INFCIRC 153) combined with the Additional Protocol (INFCIRC 540), to be the verification standard under the Treaty.