Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

One claim in the sixth instalment was found to be a duplicate of a claim awarded compensation in the fifth instalment.

Of these, the total amount awarded for two claims was increased by USD 8,000, while the total amount awarded for 54 claims was decreased by USD 114,000.

Of these, the total amount awarded for 334 claims was increased by USD 2,523,268.24 and the total amount awarded for three claims was decreased by USD 42,543.06.

Of these, the total amount awarded for one claim was increased by USD 682,000 and the total amount awarded for the other claim was decreased by USD 3,234,000.

Number of claims recommended for payment

IV. COMPENSABILITY OF THE CLAIMS

Number of Claims Recommended for Payment

The difference between the selected higher amounts and the lower amounts will be set off against any awards recommended to the claimants for their category C late claims .

Revised awards for the twenty ninth instalment claims by UNCC claim number and claimant name 46

In consequence, bedoun were unable to claim full compensation, available to other claimants.

The total amount asserted for claims preparation costs is USD 76,339.12.

(ii) Insurance Claims and Compensation Section

An award was recommended in respect of this claim by the C Panel and paid to the detainee's father.

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment stand alone claims by UNCC claim number and claimant name 23

It should be noted that, in respect of 24 claims, the excess amounts previously awarded in respect of the category A claims have been deducted from the amount of compensation recommended by the Panel for the successful matching category C Palestinian late claims.

UNCC claim number 3013967.

Number of Claims Not Recommended for Payment

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment E2 claim by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 43

Revised awards for the twenty ninth instalment claims by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 47

The results of this analysis showed that the proposed average and median recommended awards for claims in this instalment were lower than those for comparable claimants in the regular category D claims programme.

The Panel recommends no award of compensation for three claims.

Recommended awards for category C claims

IV. COMPENSABILITY OF THE CLAIMS 65 98 18

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment stand alone claims by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 24

Table. 1 Recommended awards for the deceased detainee claims

Such a limit has been introduced recently in respect of reimbursements for death and disability benefits compensation and liability for third party claims.

The Panel finds that the other components of the claim for the payment of relief are not compensable.

The searches identified 104 E4 claims with approved awards of compensation in the first seven instalments as potentially overlapping with 61 claims in category C and 70 claims in category D .

The Panel recommends awards of compensation in respect of all 2, C4 CPHO and 19 C4 MV claims and no awards of compensation in respect of five C4 CPHO claims and 6 C4 MV claims in the fourth instalment.

As shown in table 2 below, the Panel recommends a total of USD 25,872,466.70.

UNCC claim numbers 3013911 and 3013912.

Furthermore, claimants who filed more than one eligible claim within the bedoun programme will receive compensation only with respect to one of those claims.

This fifth instalment reports the adjusted recommended award amounts for such claims.

the fifth instalment of category C claims are not recommended for payment.

It is recommended that no compensation be awarded for the duplicate claim in the sixth instalment.

As a consequence of the consolidation of the new losses claimed by the individual claimants and the provision of evidence, the Panel recommends adjustments to the original awards resulting in a net increase in the amount of recommended compensation for the E4 claims.

As a result of this clerical error, the Panel recommended no compensation for the claimant's DS (Other) loss claim for school fees.

Table 1. Recommended awards for category A claims

Table 2. Recommended awards for category C claims

Accordingly the Panel recommends that no compensation be awarded for this claim.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel's recommendation in respect of claim No. 5000394 is summarized in table 6.

Consequently, Jordan has failed to meet the evidentiary requirements for compensation as specified in article 35(3) of the Rules.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no compensation for this part of the first claim unit.