Executive Board decision 2003 24

Based on Executive Board decision 2002 18.

See annex, decision 2005 1, for the decision adopted by the Executive Board.

(See annex, decision 2005 2, for the decision adopted by the Executive Board.

(See annex, decision 2005 10 for the decision adopted by the Executive Board.

See annex, decision 2005 9 for the decision adopted by the Executive Board.

See annex, decision 2005 7 for the decision adopted by the Executive Board.

See annex, decision 2005 18, for the decision adopted by the Executive Board.

See annex, decision 2005 12, for the decision adopted by the Executive Board.

On 25 February 2002, the Aliens Appeals Board upheld the decision of the Migration Board.

See annex, decision 2005 4 for the decision adopted by the Board on the draft CPDs.

Draft decision for consideration by the Trade and Development Board

The Board may wish to consider adopting the following decision

See annex, decision 2005 11, for the decision adopted by the Executive Board on the draft CPDs.

(a) Recalled decision IDB.29 4 of the Industrial Development Board

H. Follow up to Executive Board decision 2004 8 on joint programming

See annex, decision 2005 3 for the text adopted by the Board.

Implementation of Executive Board decision 2002 4 on approval of country programmes

The Committee recommended to the Board the adoption of the following draft decision

The Executive Director recommends that the Executive Board approve the following draft decision

On 2 September 2002, the Appeal Aliens Board upheld the Migration Board's decision.

The Board may wish to consider the adoption of the following draft decision

(b) Recommended to the Industrial Development Board the adoption of the following draft decision

Subsequent vacancies were filled upon the adoption of Board decision IDB.29 Dec.8.

2005 9 Implementation of Executive Board decision 2002 4 on approval of country programmes

Whenever, in the judgment of the Chair, a decision must be taken by the Executive Board which cannot be postponed until the next meeting of the Executive Board, the Chair shall transmit to each member a proposed decision, with an invitation to approve the decision by consensus.

1 The decision of the board of directors and the opinions of the independent directors

The Committee recommended to the Industrial Development Board the adoption of the following draft decision

The Committee recommended to the Industrial Development Board the adoption of the following draft decision

On the other hand, he agreed that a decision must be taken by the Board.

The Board considered a draft decision submitted by the President (IDB.30 L.2) and adopted decision IDB.30 Dec.2 (see annex I).

The Board considered a draft decision submitted by the President (IDB.30 L.3) and adopted decision IDB.30 Dec.3 (see annex I).

The Board considered a draft decision submitted by the President (IDB.30 L.13) and adopted decision IDB.30 Dec.5 (see annex I).

The Board considered a draft decision submitted by the President (IDB.30 L.5) and adopted decision IDB.30 Dec.6 (see annex I).

The Board considered a draft decision submitted by the President (IDB.30 L.9) and adopted decision IDB.30 Dec.7 (see annex I).

The Board considered a draft decision submitted by the President (IDB.30 L.11) and adopted decision IDB.30 Dec.8 (see annex I).

The Board considered a draft decision submitted by the President (IDB.30 L.12) and adopted decision IDB.30 Dec.9 (see annex I).

The Board considered a draft decision submitted by the President (IDB.30 L.6) and adopted decision IDB.30 Dec.10 (see annex I).

The Board considered a draft decision submitted by the President (IDB.30 L.7) and adopted decision IDB.30 Dec.13 (see annex I).

The Board considered a draft decision submitted by the President (IDB.30 L.8) and adopted decision IDB.30 Dec.14 (see annex I).

Adopted decision 2005 32 of 9 September 2005 on the working methods of the Executive Board

Welcoming the decision of the Executive Board to actively promote a fund raising strategy for the Institute,

It also contains a draft decision for consideration by the General Conference based on the Board recommendations.

An appeal in respect of such a decision may not be submitted to the Joint Appeals Board.

In the present case, the Migration Board took its decision after interviewing the complainant for three hours.