Concerning the issue of duplicate claims, the secretariat indicated that it was aware of the risk of duplicate claims from the outset of claims processing and took steps to identify and eliminate such claims during the course of claims processing.

The fifth F4 instalment includes a number of claims or parts of claims that were deferred from previous F4 instalments or transferred from other claims categories.

Masaru claims that he is innocent.

Second instalment category A claims corrections Third instalment category A claims corrections Fourth instalment category A claims corrections Fifth instalment category A claims corrections Sixth instalment category A claims corrections First instalment category C claims corrections Fourth instalment category C claims corrections

That doesn't mean that Russia's claims are all false.

Category A corrections higher to lower amounts Family to individual The Government of the Philippines reported that 17 claims originally filed as family claims were in fact individual claims.

Therefore the Palestinian Panel determined that these two claims were ineligible for inclusion in the Palestinian late claims programme.

Details of the claims or parts of claims that were deferred from previous F4 instalments or transferred from other claims categories are discussed in the relevant sections of this report.

The fourthsecond group of overlapping claims initially consisted of E4 claims related to 39seven category C claims and 24 category C and D claims.

Soon after the Panel commenced its review of the eligible category D Palestinian late claims , it became apparent that this claims population exhibits certain features that were not present in the claims in the regular category D claims programme or, if present, were not present to the same degree.

The Palestinian Panel determined that 17 of the 19 claims were eligible for inclusion in the Palestinian late claims programme.

A preliminary examination of these claims revealed that some, but not all, of the Kuwaiti companies in issue had filed claims with the Commission, which were being processed as E4 claims.

Duplicate claims The Commission received information from the Government of Jordan that two claims were potentially duplicative of two other claims that were awarded compensation in category C Having reviewed the information received from the Government of Jordan, the secretariat confirms that the claims are, indeed, duplicates and should not have been awarded compensation.

The Court held nevertheless that claims of non parties that derived from the main claims ought to be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration.

With regard to Iraq's contention that some of the claims are for indirect losses, the Claimants state that these claims are not for indirect losses since, by their very nature, they can only be claims of the State.

The Panel considers that these features of the claims population give rise to a potential risk of overstatement of the claims.

Having concluded that this consolidated claim, in effect consists of 82 claims, comprising 67 managing agent and 15 insurance company claims,

The individual category C and D claims in the thirtieth instalment are claims filed through a late claims programme established by the Governing Council for Palestinians who can demonstrate that they did not have a full and effective opportunity to file claims with the Commission during its filing period for individual claims from 1 January 1992 to 1 January 1996 (the regular filing period for individual claims ).

The average number of loss types is 3.14 for the claims in this instalment, compared with 2.01 for all claims in the regular category D claims programme, 1.93 for Jordanian claims and 1.71 for Kuwaiti claims.

The Panel notes that the claim for cancelled Kuwaiti dinars is significantly larger than similar claims the regular category D claims programme.

With regard to claims for expenses resulting from public health expenditures, Iraq contends that there is no legal basis for such claims.

The UNCC secretariat commented that it has also assisted the D2 Panel of Commissioners in its review of the category D Palestinian late claims, a claims population with a significant risk of overstated claims.

Noting further that 28 such claims have received US 65 million and 16 claims have received 55 million in accordance with decision 100 (S AC.26 Dec.100 (2000) Rev.1), and that 15 claims have received 9.6 million and 26 claims have received 9.5 million in accordance with decision 197 and decision 227,

The average amount claimed for the claims in this instalment is about USD 2 million, compared to about USD 820,000 for all claims, about USD 934,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 861,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

review of non overlapping claims in the FOURTHsecond group of overlapping claims

These E4 claims were considered in the second instalment of E4 claims.

Duplicate claims

Reclamation claims

Decides also that, based on the above corrections, the corrected total awards by instalment are as follows Recommended corrected total awards for category A claims Recommended corrected total awards for category C claims Recommended corrected total awards for category D claims Recommended corrected total awards for category C Palestinian late claims

The one individual claim that was not filed through the Palestinian late claims programme was originally filed in the regular filing period for individual claims.

It therefore concludes that the author has failed to substantiate his claims for purposes of admissibility, under article 2 of the Optional Protocol, and that these claims are thus inadmissible.

Of the 24 company claims in this instalment, 19 are stand alone claims four are corporate detainee claims and one is an E2 claim.

The Commission received information from the Governments of the Philippines, India and Jordan that claims, which they had submitted in category A , were potentially duplicate claims.

In connection with the claims by governments for loss of life and reduced quality of life of their nationals, Iraq asserts that the claims are inadmissible because the Claimants concerned lack legal standing to bring such claims before the Commission.

The process claims were allowed by the Patent Examiner, while the product claims disallowed.

Admissibility of claims

(e) Medical claims

Stand alone claims

It was further observed that draft subparagraph 83 (b)(ii) applied only to claims against the carrier, while claims brought by the carrier were outside its scope.

The median amount claimed is about USD 470,000 for claims in this instalment, compared with about USD 263,000 for all claims, about USD 335,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 276,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme Approximately 75 per cent of the claims in this instalment contain D8 D9 business losses in relation to unincorporated establishments in Kuwait.

4.3 Alternatively, the State party submits that the complainant's claims are unfounded.

The Panel found that additional measures were required to verify the claims.

The E4 claims population consists of claims submitted by Kuwaiti private sector corporations and entities, other than oil sector and environmental claims, eligible to file claims under the Commission's Claim Forms for Corporations and Other Entities ( Form E ).

As a result of the computer programme and manual follow up, 37,850 category A claims were identified as confirmed duplicate claims during the course of claims processing.