Cuba amendment to draft resolution L.85

Russian Federation amendment to draft resolution L.88

Draft decision XVII L Proposed amendment by the European Community for expedited amendment of the Montreal Protocol

Israel amendment to draft resolution A C.2 60 L.34

He supported retaining the text of draft article 3 without amendment.

If draft paragraph 3 (b) was not deleted, his delegation would propose an amendment to draft article 9.

The representative of Cuba orally revised the draft amendment, which read as follows

He supported the amendment to draft paragraph 5 proposed by the representative of Paraguay.

The report on the outcome of the deliberation on the draft of Amendment (X) to the Criminal Law, and the report on the outcome of the deliberation on the draft amendment of 11 laws including the Accounting Law.

Mr. Sorabjee proposed an amendment to the draft decision, which was accepted by the sponsors.

It also supported the amendment to draft paragraph 5 proposed by the representative of Paraguay.

Mr. Alfonso Martínez proposed an amendment to the draft decision, which was accepted by the sponsors.

The representative of China introduced an amendment (E CN.4 2005 100) to draft resolution E CN.4 2005 L.50, sponsored by China. The amendment read as follows

Programme budget implications of draft resolution A 60 L.34 and its amendment (A 60 L.35)

The General Legal Division revised the draft amendment, incorporating in it suggested criteria for the application of the provision the amendment has now been adopted as section 9.8 of the Procurement Manual.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland amendment to draft decision 1, proposed by the Sub Commission

O'Connor proposed an amendment to operative paragraph 1 of the draft resolution, which was accepted by the sponsors.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland amendment to draft decision 2 proposed by the Sub Commission

Mr. Decaux proposed an amendment to operative paragraph 8 of the draft resolution, which was accepted by the sponsors.

He agreed with the proposed deletion of the bracketed text in draft paragraph 2 and with the amendment to draft paragraph 5 proposed by the representative of Paraguay.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland amendment to draft resolution A C.2 60 L.32 Rev.1

Mr. Alfonso Martínez proposed an amendment to operative paragraph 4 of the draft resolution, which was accepted by the sponsors.

Mr. Sorabjee proposed an amendment to operative paragraph 7 of the draft resolution, which was also accepted by the sponsors.

The representative of the Russian Federation introduced an amendment (E CN.4 2005 89) to the draft resolution E CN.4 2005 L.88 sponsored by the Russian Federation, which was subsequently withdrawn. The amendment read as follows

Action on draft resolution A C.3 60 L.54 and amendment thereto contained in document A C.3 60 L.70

Mr. Bengoa proposed an amendment to paragraph 9 of the document annexed to the draft decision, which was accepted by the sponsors.

Mr. Bengoa proposed an amendment to paragraph 9 of the document annexed to the draft decision, which was accepted by the sponsors.

That amendment had found its way into the draft report for the current year's Seminar, although the issue had not been discussed.

Amendment

A draft amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material has now been prepared with the active participation of Russian experts.

Mr. Awad (Egypt) expressed the full support of the Non Aligned Movement for both the draft text as a whole and the Iranian amendment.

Of course, the need for such an article would also depend on what overall amendment procedure the Commission decided to adopt for the draft convention.

The representative of Cuba introduced the amendment (E CN.4 2005 99) to the draft resolution E CN.4 2005 L.85 sponsored by Norway.

When the time came to discuss draft paragraph 6, he would propose that it be deleted in the light of the amendment to paragraph 4.

Amendment 1

Amendment 2

Amendment 3

Proposed amendment by the European Community for expedited amendment of the Montreal Protocol

Where, however, the adoption of one amendment necessarily implies the rejection of another amendment, the latter amendment shall not be put to the vote.

Mr. Alfonso Martínez proposed an amendment to the draft resolution by deleting operative paragraphs 4, 5, 6 and 7, which was not accepted by the sponsors.

In view of the oral amendment to the draft resolution, the Secretariat would proceed with the implementation of paragraphs 10, 25 and 37 where capacity existed.

Mr. Burman (United States of America) said that his delegation supported draft article 17 and had no objection to maintaining the amendment mentioned in footnote 8.

Revision and amendment

Amendment and revision

Method of amendment