Here's my proposal.

He didn't agree to my proposal.

He wouldn't look at my proposal.

He wouldn't look at my proposal.

He reluctantly agreed to my proposal.

We can also say that there was an emerging consensus on my proposal at least on my proposal on the item on nuclear weapons before the NAM proposal arose.

The proposal that NAM made at that meeting, after the separate consultations to discuss my proposal specifically, to decide whether or not to include the words and non proliferation at the end of my nuclear disarmament proposal was not resolved, so my conclusion was that there was no consensus on my proposal.

This was exactly my proposal in the consultations.

It is also my proposal to signal any violations.

The representative of the Russian Federation indicated his delegation's preference, so to speak, for working on my proposal the Chair's proposal.

Here that's just my new proposal here for the Union Jack.

Similarly, there was one objection only one to my nuclear disarmament proposal.

The word non proliferation never appeared at the end of my proposal.

That is my proposal and, as I said, that proposal was based on the fact that I culled it from the last resolution of the General Assembly.

So I suggest that perhaps we should look again at my first proposal on nuclear disarmament.

And so when I discovered that you had posted my surprise proposal to my girlfriend at the very bottom, I was beside myself.

Let me outline the virtues of our proposal, which is being circulated again today with my statement.

The Chairman I believe it was clear that there was no consensus on my nuclear disarmament proposal.

The proposal before us, which my country sponsors, forms a good basis for coping with such catastrophes.

It is therefore my hope that members of the Council will give serious consideration to my proposal for a reconfigured and scaled down mission.

From my vantage point, it appears as if it was as an afterthought that an attempt was made to let us be realistic amend my proposal.

My proposal was met with agreement, and I will convene the first meeting of the Kosovo Forum next week.

Those who were not present would be pleased to know that there was almost a consensus on my proposal.

Based on my assessment of the mood of, and the positions held by, delegations, I suggest unless the House disagrees that my proposal remain on the table.

Jonas Bendiksen, a very energetic photographer, came to me and said, We need to document this, and here's my proposal.

My delegation also had the opportunity, during our statement in the General Assembly on 11 July, to explain the proposal.

The Chairman I had requested that my proposal remain the table, and at least one delegation expressed support for that.

Proposal

I close my remarks by reiterating our proposal that we ought to be working for a new synthesis, a new consensus.

The Chairman I did take note of the attempts made to amend my second proposal on conventional weapons, but I did not want to deal with those at that stage, since we are focussing on the first proposal.

And a lot of my architectural ideas that came from it accidental, again it was an intuitive kind of thing, and I just kept going with it, and made this proposal for a building, which was only a proposal.

It is with this in mind that my delegation supports the welcome proposal of the Secretary General to establish a Peacebuilding Commission.

A proposal is considered an amendment to another proposal if it merely adds to, deletes from or revises part of that proposal.

PROPOSAL PRODUCERS

EU PROPOSAL

In that regard, my delegation reiterates its proposal for interaction between the Council and the Assembly to facilitate complementary action on the problem.

My delegation still supports the five Ambassadors' proposal and considers that it forms a good basis for relaunching the work of the CD.

We are dealing with the Chair's proposal and not with a United States proposal or any proposal from any delegation or group of delegations.

Proposal by Cuba

DRAFT Internal Proposal

We heard today a response from the United States delegation to the NAM proposal, and now we are hearing a proposal from the United States that seems to me to be a new proposal, not the Chair's proposal.

In keeping with my proposal to submit regular reports for onward transmission to the Security Council, as required by Security Council resolution 1031 (1995), I plan to send my next report in August 2005.

Anne accepted Henry's proposal.

I have a proposal.

Background to the proposal