16. Outliers are those claims that do not resemble similarly situated claims.

In that context she claims that

Masaru claims that he is innocent.

Concerning the issue of duplicate claims, the secretariat indicated that it was aware of the risk of duplicate claims from the outset of claims processing and took steps to identify and eliminate such claims during the course of claims processing.

multiple claims Two or more claims in category C that were submitted under the late claims programme by individuals who are related to each other.

In this decision the Governing Council determined that category C claims, together with claims in categories A and B , were considered to be urgent claims.

In this Decision the Governing Council determined that category C claims, together with claims in categories A and B , were considered to be urgent claims.

PANADI claims that there were 300 deaths.

That young Englishman claims I encouraged him.

That doesn't mean that Russia's claims are all false.

He claims that that constitutes discrimination based on age.

The fifth F4 instalment includes a number of claims or parts of claims that were deferred from previous F4 instalments or transferred from other claims categories.

It was suggested that paragraph (2), which placed foreign claims on equal footing with local non priority claims, should be redrafted so as to make it clear that foreign claims would not receive better treatment than those local claims whose payment was deferred.

Germany claims that the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait

It also found that Cameroon s claims were admissible.

Second instalment category A claims corrections Third instalment category A claims corrections Fourth instalment category A claims corrections Fifth instalment category A claims corrections Sixth instalment category A claims corrections First instalment category C claims corrections Fourth instalment category C claims corrections

Also, the availability of the necessary resources should allow that the panels of the Commissioners appointed to review claims in categories D (individual claims for losses over 100,000), E (corporate claims) and F (governmental claims) start their review of claims during the first quarter of 1997.

Therefore the Palestinian Panel determined that these two claims were ineligible for inclusion in the Palestinian late claims programme.

Category A corrections higher to lower amounts Family to individual The Government of the Philippines reported that 17 claims originally filed as family claims were in fact individual claims.

Details of the claims or parts of claims that were deferred from previous F4 instalments or transferred from other claims categories are discussed in the relevant sections of this report.

The Panel notes that these Governing Council decisions relate to claims in categories A , B , C and D , whereas bedoun claims do not belong to any of these claims categories.

The Palestinian Panel determined that 17 of the 19 claims were eligible for inclusion in the Palestinian late claims programme.

Claims for loss of business income are claims for income that would have been earned over a period of time.

Five further corrections relate to category C claims that were included in the Fourth category C Palestinian late claims report.

Duplicate claims are two or more claims filed by an individual in the same claims category.

The fourthsecond group of overlapping claims initially consisted of E4 claims related to 39seven category C claims and 24 category C and D claims.

Soon after the Panel commenced its review of the eligible category D Palestinian late claims , it became apparent that this claims population exhibits certain features that were not present in the claims in the regular category D claims programme or, if present, were not present to the same degree.

But Dr. Satomi claims that Prof. Zaizen instructed you.

The Court held nevertheless that claims of non parties that derived from the main claims ought to be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration.

The Committee was further informed that the deadline for submission of claims under those categories had expired and that all claims submitted had been processed.

A preliminary examination of these claims revealed that some, but not all, of the Kuwaiti companies in issue had filed claims with the Commission, which were being processed as E4 claims.

At the Panel s request, the secretariat consulted the Commission s claims databases and dockets and determined that there was a potential overlap between several of the Claims and certain category C claims.

The Board examined a random sample of 25 category B claims and found that, as in the case of category A claims, the quality of evidence supporting the claims was variable.

Duplicate claims The Commission received information from the Government of Jordan that two claims were potentially duplicative of two other claims that were awarded compensation in category C Having reviewed the information received from the Government of Jordan, the secretariat confirms that the claims are, indeed, duplicates and should not have been awarded compensation.

Claims

claims

Claims

The Panel considers that these features of the claims population give rise to a potential risk of overstatement of the claims.

Having concluded that this consolidated claim, in effect consists of 82 claims, comprising 67 managing agent and 15 insurance company claims,

The Board s sample examination of processed claims indicated that more than 7 million had been recovered or cancelled in duplicate claims.

With regard to Iraq's contention that some of the claims are for indirect losses, the Claimants state that these claims are not for indirect losses since, by their very nature, they can only be claims of the State.

The Panel determines that a further xx 9 category D claims are eligible for inclusion in the late claims programme in addition to the 411 category D claims that were reported as eligible in its three previous reports.

With the completion of the irregularities review of claims, the Panel has determined that a total of 1,1,2 claims are not eligible for inclusion in the late claims programme due to irregularities.

During the course of the review of the category C Palestinian late claims that were included in the Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the fourth instalment of Palestinian late claims' for damages up to USD 100,000 (category C' claims) (S AC.26 2005 3), the secretariat identified 26 claims with matching category A claims that were submitted by the Government of Jordan under the regular claims programme.

The Panel notes that the claim for cancelled Kuwaiti dinars is significantly larger than similar claims the regular category D claims programme.