Otherwise, we ask that the petition be denied here and now.

He also pointed out that the committee or the Appeals Panel did not respond to the Mission's written requests for clarification.

Had their application been turned down, the complainants could have requested leave to apply for judicial review of the decision.

3.10 The Ombudsman may request the Joint Appeals Board to extend the normal time limit for filing an appeal within the framework of staff rule 111.2.

A motion for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was denied.

Hearing of petitioner

2.3 The author lodged an amparo application before the Constitutional Court, which was rejected on 29 January 1997.

Normally civil proceedings are instituted by writ of summons, petition or notice of motion.

The application for an order staying the action was denied and Automatic appealed.

In counsel's view, the complainant's statement to the court and the court's rejection of his request constitute a further clear indication that he had been subjected to torture.

If no information is received in spite of reminders, this will be recorded in the Committee's subsequent report to the General Assembly.

4.1 In June 2001, the State party submitted a request for advice on whether the complaint was ongoing .

His petition for special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was dismissed on 26 May 1988.

On 28 February 2002, the complainant withdrew an application to the High Court for leave to appeal the Full Federal Court's decision.

In P.S. v. Canada the Committee had found the communication inadmissible on the grounds that the complainant had not applied for judicial review of a decision denying his request for a ministerial waiver.

(c) The permission granted to many NGOs to operate freely in the country

Accordingly, the complainant does not have a demonstrable interest in having his complaint examined by the Committee.

Because of established protocol, the Committee might prefer to continue to receive such petitions from Member States, rather than directly from the complaining parties.

On 16 November 1990, the Court of Appeal of Jamaica dismissed his application for leave to appeal against his conviction.

Remedies available to individuals who claim to have been victims of acts of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

3. In the event that the recommendations made by the joint body and accepted by the Secretary General are unfavourable to the applicant, and insofar as this is the case, the application shall be receivable, unless the joint body unanimously considers that it is frivolous.

4.4 The State party also argues that the complaint discloses an abuse of the right of submission, disputing whether the complainant can be considered to have justifiable interest in having his complaint considered by the Committee.

In respect of the second RRT decision, the Committee observes that the complainant withdrew his application to the High Court for special leave to appeal, again without offering any reasons for this course of action.

Section 26A of the Legal Aid Ordinance provides that a legal aid applicant who has been refused legal aid for an appeal to the Court of Final Appeal may seek a review of such refusal.

(a) indicate a reasonable time period for filing claims and specify the place for their filing

In 1985 a new petition for nullification of the act on grounds of unconstitutionality was attempted.

At the same time, the Committee, acting in accordance with rule 108, paragraph 9, of its rules of procedure, requested the State party not to deport the complainant to Algeria while his complaint was being considered.

5.2 Before considering any claims contained in a complaint, the Committee against Torture must decide whether or not the complaint is admissible under article 22 of the Convention.

When his complaint was rejected at the lower court and appeal levels, the author filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court.

The State party points out that the author should have lodged an amparo application before the Constitutional Court.

2.4 The complainant submitted an application for asylum in Switzerland on 27 September 1999.

The proceedings followed their course, including joint motions for particulars, a demand for a guarantee in respect of the costs of the proceedings and discovery.

Ireland, Application No. 31253 96, 123 I.L.R. (2001) 73 Al Adsani v. United Kingdom, Application No. 35763 97, 123 I.L.R. (2001) 24, 2001 ECHR Vol. XI Banković v. Belgium, 123 I.L.R.

The claims concerned separate administrative decisions on the respective party's application for full exemption from the CKREE tuition.

He requested medical assistance in Sweden at the clinic for asylum seekers in Fittja.

His application for leave to appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 29 February 1988 a reasoned appeal judgement was issued on 14 March 1988.

Counsel requested a delay of the examination of the case until 31 January 2002, to obtain documentary evidence of the complainant's case from Bangladesh.

(a) Firstly, because the complainant has presented scant medical evidence in connection with his asylum application.

On 6 October 1992, his application for special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was equally dismissed.

Since the complainant had made the request without the assistance of counsel, he was unable to appeal the decision to the Refugee Appeals Commission.

On 26 September 2002, the applicant lodged an application for review with suspensive effect with the Swiss Asylum Review Commission.

2. Appeals and Petitions for Clemency

58. The Administrative Law Unit handles all requests for administrative reviews that are submitted by staff members as a preliminary step in the appeals process and goes on to represent the Secretary General before the Joint Appeals Board, orally and in writing, in respect of appeals filed.

The Committee takes note of the explanation provided by the delegation about the outlawing of ungazetted or unauthorized places of detention or safe houses where persons have been subjected to torture by military personnel.

4.8 In the case of the complainant Mr. S.V., the State party notes, with regard to his second asylum request, that he did not request leave to apply for judicial review of the negative decision of the Refugee Determination Division.